Tests 48 · 1 test Owners 72 · 9 reviews
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 vs Dunlop Sportsmart — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 9 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Sportsmart is ahead, 76–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Sportsmart +878Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Sportsmart Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 72 84 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 70
Sportsmart: 60% × 74.7 (est.) + 40% × 84.1 = 78
No road tests of dry for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Sportsmart. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
60
Wet
Sportsmart +1676Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Sportsmart Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 48 ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 78 78 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 47.6 + 40% × 78.4 = 60
Sportsmart: 60% × 74.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 76
No road tests of wet for Sportsmart. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
73
Comfort
Sportsmart +275Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Sportsmart Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 75 77 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 40% × 70 (est.) + 60% × 74.9 = 73
Sportsmart: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 77.3 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Sportsmart. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
Sportsmart +569Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Sportsmart Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 62 71 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64
Sportsmart: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Sportsmart. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
75
Handling (owners)
Sportsmart +984Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Sportsmart Reviews found online 75 84
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 | Dunlop Sportsmart |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 76 |
| Dry | 70 | 78 |
| Wet | 60 | 76 |
| Comfort | 73 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Battlax Sport Touring T32
Sportsmart
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Battlax Sport Touring T32
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather performance and heavy rain confidence
- High-speed stability, including at autobahn speeds with full luggage
- Immediate improvement in handling agility and steering feel compared to competitors or older tires
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear and relatively low mileage lifespan
- Rear tire can slip or slide when pushed hard in dry, warm conditions
- Reduced performance feel after a few thousand miles of use
Tire B Sportsmart
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip that inspires rider confidence
- Predictable feedback and handling, especially when approaching the limit
- Fast warm-up times suitable for both road and occasional track use
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, ranging from 3,000 to 8,000 miles depending on usage
- Stiff N-TEC construction can feel harsh over road imperfections
- Occasional reports of air pressure retention issues on specific rear units
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 | B · Dunlop Sportsmart |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32
Dunlop Sportsmart
Winner: Dunlop Sportsmart — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Dunlop Sportsmart rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Dunlop Sportsmart scores 76 vs 60 on wet.
Dunlop Sportsmart scores 84 vs 75 on handling.
Dunlop Sportsmart scores 78 vs 70 on dry.
Dunlop Sportsmart scores 69 vs 64 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Sportsmart?
Which is better in the wet, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Sportsmart?
Dunlop Sportsmart, 76 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Sportsmart?
Dunlop Sportsmart, 78 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Sportsmart?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Sportsmart?
Dunlop Sportsmart, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology