Tests 47 · 1 test Owners 72 · 9 reviews
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 vs Pirelli Angel ST — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 9 + 143 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Battlax Sport Touring T32 and Angel ST are level at 67.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Battlax Sport Touring T32 +566Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 72 65 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71
Angel ST: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66
No road tests of dry for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
59
Wet
Angel ST +1170Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 47 ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 79 70 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 46.6 + 40% × 78.6 = 59
Angel ST: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
No road tests of wet for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
73
Comfort
Battlax Sport Touring T32 +568Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 76 68 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 75.5 = 73
Angel ST: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 68 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Angel ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Level64Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 62 63 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Angel ST: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
76
Handling (owners)
Battlax Sport Touring T32 +1066Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 Angel ST Reviews found online 76 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 | Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 67 |
| Dry | 71 | 66 |
| Wet | 59 | 70 |
| Comfort | 73 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Battlax Sport Touring T32
Angel ST
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Battlax Sport Touring T32
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather performance and heavy rain confidence
- High-speed stability, including at autobahn speeds with full luggage
- Immediate improvement in handling agility and steering feel compared to competitors or older tires
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear and relatively low mileage lifespan
- Rear tire can slip or slide when pushed hard in dry, warm conditions
- Reduced performance feel after a few thousand miles of use
Tire B Angel ST
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and high cornering confidence
- Reliable and predictable wet weather performance
- Light, neutral steering and overall straight-line stability
Cons
- Rear tire tends to wear out suddenly or rapidly once it passes the halfway mark
- Requires a short warm-up time (2-5 minutes) to reach optimal grip
- Shorter total mileage lifespan reported by aggressive riders or heavy commuters
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 | B · Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32
Pirelli Angel ST
Too close to call: Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 and Pirelli Angel ST are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 is stronger on handling, dry and comfort. Pirelli Angel ST is stronger on wet. Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pirelli Angel ST scores 70 vs 59 on wet.
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 scores 76 vs 66 on handling.
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 scores 71 vs 66 on dry.
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 scores 73 vs 68 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Angel ST?
Which is better in the wet, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Angel ST?
Pirelli Angel ST, 70 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Angel ST?
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32, 71 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Angel ST?
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32, 73 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or Angel ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology