Tests – · none yet Owners 84 · 8 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin City Grip 2 vs Pirelli Angel ST — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 143 owner reviews. How we score
City Grip 2 is ahead, 80–67
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
City Grip 2 +1565Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 87 64 City Grip 2: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 86.8 = 80
Angel ST: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 65
No road tests of dry for City Grip 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
84
Wet
City Grip 2 +1470Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 81 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 89 70 City Grip 2: 60% × 80.9 (est.) + 40% × 89.2 = 84
Angel ST: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70
No road tests of wet for City Grip 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
75
Comfort
City Grip 2 +768Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 79 67 City Grip 2: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 78.5 = 75
Angel ST: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 67.3 = 68
No road tests of comfort for City Grip 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
74
Treadwear
City Grip 2 +965Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 78 64 City Grip 2: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.9 = 74
Angel ST: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for City Grip 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
86
Handling (owners)
City Grip 2 +2165Why this score
Source City Grip 2 Angel ST Reviews found online 86 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin City Grip 2 | Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 67 |
| Dry | 80 | 65 |
| Wet | 84 | 70 |
| Comfort | 75 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 86 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
City Grip 2
67
/ 100
Angel ST
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A City Grip 2
Pros
- Exceptional grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Improved confidence and stability when cornering and leaning
- Solid mileage and tread longevity
Cons
- Slightly stiffer construction can reduce impact absorption or comfort on rough roads for certain riders
- Transmits noticeable road feedback and creases
- Requires a brief warm-up period of around 5 minutes to reach maximum stickiness
Tire B Angel ST
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and high cornering confidence
- Reliable and predictable wet weather performance
- Light, neutral steering and overall straight-line stability
Cons
- Rear tire tends to wear out suddenly or rapidly once it passes the halfway mark
- Requires a short warm-up time (2-5 minutes) to reach optimal grip
- Shorter total mileage lifespan reported by aggressive riders or heavy commuters
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin City Grip 2 | B · Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Michelin City Grip 2
67
/ 100
Pirelli Angel ST
Winner: Michelin City Grip 2 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin City Grip 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin City Grip 2 scores 86 vs 65 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin City Grip 2 scores 80 vs 65 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin City Grip 2 scores 84 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin City Grip 2 scores 74 vs 65 on treadwear.
Tire A · Michelin City Grip 2
Tire B · Pirelli Angel ST
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
City Grip 2 or Angel ST?
Which is better in the wet, City Grip 2 or Angel ST?
Michelin City Grip 2, 84 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, City Grip 2 or Angel ST?
Michelin City Grip 2, 80 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, City Grip 2 or Angel ST?
Michelin City Grip 2, 75 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, City Grip 2 or Angel ST?
Michelin City Grip 2, 74 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology