Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 25 + 32 road tests and 9 + 33 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Blizzak 6 80, WinterContact TS 870 P 81.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Blizzak 6

Winter

± 4

Tests 80 · 25 tests Owners 80 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 55 in 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
± 4

Tests 83 · 32 tests Owners 81 · 33 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (dry handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 14 tests that measured wet braking for both, Blizzak 6 won 8 and WinterContact TS 870 P won 5 (average 95% vs 96% of the best).
  • In 14 tests that measured snow braking for both, Blizzak 6 won 7 and WinterContact TS 870 P won 4 (average 97% vs 96% of the best).
  • In 12 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, Blizzak 6 won 5 and WinterContact TS 870 P won 7 (average 96% vs 97% of the best).
  • In 11 tests that measured dry braking for both, Blizzak 6 won 0 and WinterContact TS 870 P won 11 (average 96% vs 98% of the best).
  • In 10 tests that measured snow traction for both, Blizzak 6 won 6 and WinterContact TS 870 P won 3 (average 97% vs 95% of the best).
  1. 79

    Dry

    WinterContact TS 870 P +2
    81
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak 6WinterContact TS 870 P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 25 tests7783
    Reviews found online8379
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 11 shared tests · wins 0–1196%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 2–699%100%
    Dry Lane Change (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–197%100%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–193%100%

    Blizzak 6: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 82.6 = 79

    WinterContact TS 870 P: 60% × 83.3 + 40% × 78.5 = 81

  2. 90

    Wet

    WinterContact TS 870 P +1
    91
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak 6WinterContact TS 870 P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 25 / 32 tests9395
    Reviews found online8686
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 4–193%89%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 12 shared tests · wins 5–796%97%
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–288%97%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 14 shared tests · wins 8–595%96%
    Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%96%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 2–397%96%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 3–598%99%

    Blizzak 6: 60% × 93.3 + 40% × 86.1 = 90

    WinterContact TS 870 P: 60% × 94.6 + 40% × 86.1 = 91

  3. 80

    Snow

    Blizzak 6 +1
    79
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak 6WinterContact TS 870 P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 24 / 31 tests8180
    Reviews found online7876
    Ice Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–094%84%
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 14 shared tests · wins 7–497%96%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 4–599%99%
    Snow Slalom (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–298%99%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 10 shared tests · wins 6–397%95%
    Ice Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–140%50%
    Snow Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–364%81%

    Blizzak 6: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 77.9 = 80

    WinterContact TS 870 P: 60% × 80.2 + 40% × 76.4 = 79

  4. 82

    Comfort

    WinterContact TS 870 P +6
    88
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak 6WinterContact TS 870 P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 8 tests8798
    Reviews found online7881
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 2–587%91%

    Blizzak 6: 40% × 87.3 + 60% × 77.8 = 82

    WinterContact TS 870 P: 40% × 98.1 + 60% × 80.7 = 88

  5. 57

    Noise

    WinterContact TS 870 P +16
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak 6WinterContact TS 870 P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 22 tests5178
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 10 shared tests · wins 0–1097%99%

    Blizzak 6: 60% × 51.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 57

    WinterContact TS 870 P: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 73

    No owner ratings of noise for Blizzak 6 or WinterContact TS 870 P. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 76

    Treadwear

    Blizzak 6 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak 6WinterContact TS 870 P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 8 tests7770
    Reviews found online7580
    Abrasion (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–180%82%
    Wear (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 3–187%82%

    Blizzak 6: 60% × 76.8 + 40% × 75.4 = 76

    WinterContact TS 870 P: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 80.2 = 74

  7. 83

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    83
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak 6WinterContact TS 870 P
    Reviews found online8383
  8. 82

    Efficiency

    WinterContact TS 870 P +4
    86
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak 6WinterContact TS 870 P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 24 tests8286
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–196%97%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 2–794%96%
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak 6Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Relative Score 80 81
Dry 79 81
Wet 90 91
Snow 80 79
Comfort 82 88
Noise 57 73
Treadwear 76 74
Handling (owners) 83 83
Efficiency 82 86

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Blizzak 6

± 4

WinterContact TS 870 P

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 16 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Blizzak 6 finished ahead 7 times and Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 9 times.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak 6WinterContact TS 870 PΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% 98% −2.2 0–11 in 11 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Dry Handling Dry 99% 100% −0.3 2–6 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 93% 100% −7.0 0–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test · 205/45 R 17
Dry Lane Change Dry 97% 100% −2.7 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test · 235/45 R18
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 93% 89% +3.3 4–1 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% 97% −0.4 5–7 in 12 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wet Braking Wet 95% 96% −1.0 8–5 in 14 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 100% 96% +3.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Wet Circle Wet 97% 96% +0.3 2–3 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wet Handling Wet 98% 99% −0.8 3–5 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 88% 97% −9.2 0–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test · 205/45 R 17
Ice Braking Snow 94% 84% +9.8 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Ice Handling (tester's mark) Snow 40% 50% −10.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test · 235/45 R18
Snow Braking Snow 97% 96% +0.9 7–4 in 14 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Handling Snow 99% 99% −0.1 4–5 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Handling (tester's mark) Snow 64% 81% −17.5 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test · 205/45 R 17
Snow Slalom Snow 98% 99% −1.1 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Traction Snow 97% 95% +2.0 6–3 in 10 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 87% 91% −3.7 2–5 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Noise Noise 97% 99% −1.2 0–10 in 10 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Abrasion Treadwear 80% 82% −1.4 0–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Wear Treadwear 87% 82% +5.4 3–1 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 96% 97% −0.6 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test · 235/45 R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 94% 96% −2.8 2–7 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #10/20 #11/20 – 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Value Cost 58% 52% +6.2 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Road Rating (tester's mark) Other 100% 90% +10.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test · 235/45 R18
Overall Ranking Overall #5/20 #1/20 – 7–9 in 16 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak 6

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction on snow and ice
  • Improved cornering stability compared to the Blizzak 5
  • Confident handling on steep mountain roads and winter inclines

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users after limited mileage
  • Numb or less communicative steering feel compared to predecessor models or stiffer alternatives like the LM005
All owner themes in the Blizzak 6 review

Tire B WinterContact TS 870 P

Pros

  • Exceptionally low noise levels and high ride comfort
  • Outstanding wet weather and slush performance, cutting through heavy rain effortlessly
  • Balanced dry and cold-weather handling with impressive cornering stability

Cons

  • Higher price point compared to some competitors
  • Steering response and initial stiffness are slightly softer and less sporty than dedicated summer tires or some rivals
  • Snow and ice traction can feel less exceptional or borderline inadequate for a small subset of users
All owner themes in the WinterContact TS 870 P review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak 6 B · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available192121
Rim diameters16″ – 22″16″ – 23″
Tread depth10/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common109109

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 and Continental WinterContact TS 870 P are within 2 points overall. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P is stronger on noise, comfort and efficiency.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 73 vs 57 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 88 vs 82 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 86 vs 82 on efficiency.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Tire B · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak 6 or WinterContact TS 870 P?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak 6 or WinterContact TS 870 P?

Neither, by our numbers: 90 vs 91 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak 6 or WinterContact TS 870 P?

Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 81 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak 6 or WinterContact TS 870 P?

Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 79 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Blizzak 6 or WinterContact TS 870 P?

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P, 73 vs 57 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak 6 or WinterContact TS 870 P?

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P, 88 vs 82 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak 6 or WinterContact TS 870 P?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 74 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, Blizzak 6 or WinterContact TS 870 P?

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P, 86 vs 82 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology