Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 36 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 25 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Blizzak DM-V2 71, Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV 70.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 25 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Blizzak DM-V2 +265Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 67 63 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 67
Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65
No road tests of dry for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
75
Wet
Blizzak DM-V2 +570Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 77 70 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 75
Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 70
No road tests of wet for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
79
Snow
Blizzak DM-V2 +277Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 85 81 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 75.1 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 79
Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 80.8 = 77
No road tests of snow for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
Level69Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 69 69 Blizzak DM-V2: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.4 = 69
Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 68.6 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
Blizzak DM-V2 +266Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 70 64 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 68
Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 66
No road tests of noise for Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV +869Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 70 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61
Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
75
Handling (owners)
Blizzak DM-V2 +867Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV Reviews found online 75 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 70 |
| Dry | 67 | 65 |
| Wet | 75 | 70 |
| Snow | 79 | 77 |
| Comfort | 69 | 69 |
| Noise | 68 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Blizzak DM-V2
70
/ 100
Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 finished ahead 0 times and Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Blizzak DM-V2 | Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/8 | #3/8 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires · 215/60R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak DM-V2
Pros
- Exceptional grip and braking performance on snow and ice
- High level of driver confidence in severe winter weather
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Faster tread wear compared to all-season tires
- Performance degrades if left on the vehicle during warmer spring/summer months
- Potential for reduced wet-weather grip as the tire wears down
Tire B Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV
Pros
- Outstanding ice and snow traction, providing superior stopping power and lateral control
- Surprisingly smooth, comfortable, and quiet ride for a dedicated winter tire
- Reliable performance in extreme winter environments (blizzards, deep drifts, and freezing rain)
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can result in slightly imprecise cornering feel compared to some competitors
- High torque vehicles (such as the F-150 EcoBoost) can cause faster tread wear
- Can exhibit some tire noise or resonance at specific speeds, particularly as the tires age
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 73 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | 11.5/32″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
70
/ 100
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV
Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 and Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 is stronger on handling and wet. Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV is stronger on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 75 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV scores 69 vs 61 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 75 vs 70 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
Tire B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV?
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2, 75 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 77 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV?
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV, 69 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology