Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 36 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 36 + 39 owner reviews. How we score
Blizzak DM-V2 leads, 71–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 4 tests Owners 68 · 39 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Vi Studded Winter Tyre Test (snow traction)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Level67Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 67 57 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 67
Hakkapeliitta R3: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 57.3 = 67
No road tests of dry for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
75
Wet
Blizzak DM-V2 +669Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 64 Reviews found online 77 76 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 75
Hakkapeliitta R3: 60% × 64.4 + 40% × 75.8 = 69
No road tests of wet for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
79
Snow
Blizzak DM-V2 +277Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 75 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 85 85 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 75.1 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 79
Hakkapeliitta R3: 60% × 71 + 40% × 85 = 77
No road tests of snow for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
Hakkapeliitta R3 +372Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 69 74 Blizzak DM-V2: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.4 = 69
Hakkapeliitta R3: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 74.3 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Hakkapeliitta R3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
Hakkapeliitta R3 +169Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 70 62 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 68
Hakkapeliitta R3: 60% × 73 + 40% × 61.8 = 69
No road tests of noise for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
Blizzak DM-V2 +160Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 58 56 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61
Hakkapeliitta R3: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Hakkapeliitta R3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
75
Handling (owners)
Blizzak DM-V2 +867Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R3 Reviews found online 75 67 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison72Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 69 |
| Dry | 67 | 67 |
| Wet | 75 | 69 |
| Snow | 79 | 77 |
| Comfort | 69 | 72 |
| Noise | 68 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 67 |
| Efficiency | – | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Blizzak DM-V2
Hakkapeliitta R3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Blizzak DM-V2 | Hakkapeliitta R3 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/8 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires | #8/15 2022 Consumer Reports Winter Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak DM-V2
Pros
- Exceptional grip and braking performance on snow and ice
- High level of driver confidence in severe winter weather
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Faster tread wear compared to all-season tires
- Performance degrades if left on the vehicle during warmer spring/summer months
- Potential for reduced wet-weather grip as the tire wears down
Tire B Hakkapeliitta R3
Pros
- Outstanding grip and acceleration on snow and ice
- Predictable and confidence-inspiring handling in harsh winter weather
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Soft sidewalls result in vague steering feedback and 'wandering' at highway speeds
- Faster tread wear compared to all-season or harder-compound winter tires
- Reduced performance and stability on dry, warm asphalt
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 73 | 5 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 17″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | 10.5/32″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 — better handling and wet. Pick the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 if comfort matters most to you.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 75 vs 67 on handling.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 75 vs 69 on wet.
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 scores 72 vs 69 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R3?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R3?
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2, 75 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R3?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R3?
Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 77 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R3?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R3?
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3, 72 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R3?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 60 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology