Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak Ice vs Continental VikingContact 8 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 8 road tests and 3 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

VikingContact 8 is ahead, 76–63

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Blizzak Ice

Blizzak Ice

Winter

± 7

Tests 60 · 5 tests Owners 66 · 3 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 17 in 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 (exterior noise)

Continental VikingContact 8
± 5

Tests 74 · 8 tests Owners 79 · 12 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test (snow handling (tester's mark))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    VikingContact 8 +10
    75
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceVikingContact 8
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 6 tests6475
    Reviews found online6775

    Blizzak Ice: 60% × 63.6 + 40% × 66.8 = 65

    VikingContact 8: 60% × 74.6 + 40% × 75.2 = 75

  2. 54

    Wet

    VikingContact 8 +18
    72
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceVikingContact 8
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 7 tests4463
    Reviews found online7085

    Blizzak Ice: 60% × 43.6 + 40% × 69.6 = 54

    VikingContact 8: 60% × 63 + 40% × 84.9 = 72

  3. 62

    Snow

    VikingContact 8 +16
    78
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceVikingContact 8
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 6 tests6377
    Reviews found online6280

    Blizzak Ice: 60% × 62.6 + 40% × 61.9 = 62

    VikingContact 8: 60% × 77.4 + 40% × 79.9 = 78

  4. 67

    Comfort

    VikingContact 8 +18
    85
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceVikingContact 8
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests7091
    Reviews found online6582

    Blizzak Ice: 40% × 70 + 60% × 65.3 = 67

    VikingContact 8: 40% × 91.1 + 60% × 81.7 = 85

  5. 76

    Noise

    VikingContact 8 +4
    80
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceVikingContact 8
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 5 tests8379
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)81

    Blizzak Ice: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 76

    VikingContact 8: 60% × 78.8 + 40% × 81.3 = 80

    No owner ratings of noise for Blizzak Ice. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    VikingContact 8 +6
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceVikingContact 8
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6777

    Blizzak Ice: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    VikingContact 8: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for VikingContact 8. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    VikingContact 8 +11
    76
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceVikingContact 8
    Reviews found online6576
  8. 48

    Efficiency

    VikingContact 8 +30
    78
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceVikingContact 8
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 4 tests4878
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Blizzak Ice vs Continental VikingContact 8: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak IceContinental VikingContact 8
Relative Score 63 76
Dry 65 75
Wet 54 72
Snow 62 78
Comfort 67 85
Noise 76 80
Treadwear 67 73
Handling (owners) 65 76
Efficiency 48 78

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Blizzak Ice

± 5

VikingContact 8

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Blizzak Ice finished ahead 0 times and Continental VikingContact 8 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak IceVikingContact 8ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/7 #1/7 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Moottori Studless Winter Tire Test R16 · 205/55R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak Ice

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B VikingContact 8

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and grip on ice and hard-packed snow
  • High level of ride comfort, effectively soaking up potholes and rough roads
  • Remarkably quiet operation with minimal tread noise

Cons

  • Slightly soft cornering feel
  • Noticeable gap in steering response and lack of feel on straightaways
  • Occasional slip reported on really dry roads at low speeds
All owner themes in the VikingContact 8 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak Ice B · Continental VikingContact 8
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available60123
Rim diameters13″ – 19″15″ – 22″
Tread depth—10 - 11/32″
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common3535

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak Ice

Continental VikingContact 8

Winner: Continental VikingContact 8 — better efficiency, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Continental VikingContact 8 scores 78 vs 48 on efficiency.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental VikingContact 8 scores 72 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Continental VikingContact 8 scores 85 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Continental VikingContact 8 scores 78 vs 62 on snow.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak Ice
Tire B · Continental VikingContact 8

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak Ice or VikingContact 8?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak Ice or VikingContact 8?

Continental VikingContact 8, 72 vs 54 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak Ice or VikingContact 8?

Continental VikingContact 8, 75 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak Ice or VikingContact 8?

Continental VikingContact 8, 78 vs 62 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak Ice or VikingContact 8?

Continental VikingContact 8, 80 vs 76 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak Ice or VikingContact 8?

Continental VikingContact 8, 85 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak Ice or VikingContact 8?

Continental VikingContact 8, 73 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Blizzak Ice or VikingContact 8?

Continental VikingContact 8, 78 vs 48 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology