tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 21 owner reviews. How we score

Blizzak LM-25 RFT is ahead, 71–65

Check price on Amazon · Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak LM-32 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTBlizzak LM-32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6863

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 65

    No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +10
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTBlizzak LM-32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7764

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 75

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65

    No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 76

    Snow

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +10
    66
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTBlizzak LM-32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7963

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 79 = 76

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +5
    61
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTBlizzak LM-32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6558

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.7 = 66

    Blizzak LM-32: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 63

    Noise

    Level
    63
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTBlizzak LM-32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5959

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 63

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.9 = 63

    No road tests of noise for Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak LM-32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTBlizzak LM-32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6966

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 68

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +7
    59
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTBlizzak LM-32
    Reviews found online6659
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFTBridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Relative Score 71 65
Dry 68 65
Wet 75 65
Snow 76 66
Comfort 66 61
Noise 63 63
Treadwear 68 66
Handling (owners) 66 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Blizzak LM-25 RFT

± 7

Blizzak LM-32

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM-25 RFT

Pros

  • Outstanding traction and grip in deep, fresh, and compacted snow
  • Exceptional ice performance and handling on steep inclines in freezing temperatures
  • Effective slush dispersal and wet weather performance

Cons

  • Significantly longer braking distances on dry roads when temperatures rise above 20°C
  • Reduced braking performance in wet conditions if ambient temperatures are too high
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-25 RFT review

Tire B Blizzak LM-32

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and reliability in deep snow and winter storms
  • Stable and satisfying handling on cold, dry roads
  • Good resistance to aquaplaning and solid durability/tread life reported by some users

Cons

  • Poor and unpredictable wet weather grip, leading to wheel spin and sliding
  • Noticeable road noise and humming that increases as the tread wears down
  • Vague steering feel and lackluster performance under quick acceleration
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available336
Rim diameters17″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth11/32″11/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT — better wet, snow and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 75 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 76 vs 66 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 66 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 66 vs 61 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak LM-32?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak LM-32?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 75 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak LM-32?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 68 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak LM-32?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 76 vs 66 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak LM-32?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak LM-32?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 66 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak LM-32?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology