Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 63 · 21 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 21 + 8 owner reviews. How we score
Blizzak LM-25 RFT is ahead, 73–68
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 8 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Blizzak WS90 +370Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Blizzak LM-25 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 85 ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 55 72 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 54.7 = 73
Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70
No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
67
Wet
Blizzak LM-25 RFT +1077Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Blizzak LM-25 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 66 ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 69 80 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 65.6 + 40% × 68.7 = 67
Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 77
No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
73
Snow
Blizzak LM-25 RFT +275Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Blizzak LM-25 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 69 ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 78 78 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 68.7 + 40% × 78.4 = 73
Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 75
No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
Blizzak LM-25 RFT +869Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Blizzak LM-25 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 68 ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 56 69 Blizzak WS90: 40% × 68.3 + 60% × 55.7 = 61
Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 69.4 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Blizzak LM-25 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 – Reviews found online 51 – Blizzak WS90: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 51.3 = 63
-
61
Treadwear
Blizzak LM-25 RFT +970Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Blizzak LM-25 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 72 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61
Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak WS90. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Blizzak LM-25 RFT +668Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Blizzak LM-25 RFT Reviews found online 62 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 73 |
| Dry | 73 | 70 |
| Wet | 67 | 77 |
| Snow | 73 | 75 |
| Comfort | 61 | 69 |
| Noise | 63 | – |
| Treadwear | 61 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Blizzak WS90
Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak WS90
Pros
- Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
- Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
- Strong capability in slush and deep snow
Cons
- Increased road noise during highway driving
- Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
- Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
Tire B Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep, fresh, or compacted snow and ice
- Transforms rear-wheel-drive vehicles into capable winter drivers
- Softer, quieter, and more comfortable ride compared to standard summer run-flat tires
Cons
- Longer braking distances on dry roads when temperatures rise above freezing
- Reduced braking performance and handling when temperatures exceed 20 degrees Celsius
- Prone to ABS and ESP activation on slick ice surfaces
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 45 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT — better wet, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 if dry matters most to you. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 77 vs 67 on wet.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 70 vs 61 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 69 vs 61 on comfort.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 68 vs 62 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak WS90 or Blizzak LM-25 RFT?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak WS90 or Blizzak LM-25 RFT?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 77 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak WS90 or Blizzak LM-25 RFT?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak WS90 or Blizzak LM-25 RFT?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak WS90 or Blizzak LM-25 RFT?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 69 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak WS90 or Blizzak LM-25 RFT?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 70 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology