Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 8 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT vs Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 8 + 21 owner reviews. How we score
Blizzak LM-25 RFT is ahead, 73–68
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 63 · 21 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Blizzak WS90 +373Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT Blizzak WS90 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 85 Reviews found online 72 55 Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70
Blizzak WS90: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 54.7 = 73
No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
77
Wet
Blizzak LM-25 RFT +1067Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT Blizzak WS90 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 76 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 80 69 Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 77
Blizzak WS90: 60% × 65.6 + 40% × 68.7 = 67
No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
75
Snow
Blizzak LM-25 RFT +273Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT Blizzak WS90 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 78 78 Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 75
Blizzak WS90: 60% × 68.7 + 40% × 78.4 = 73
No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
Blizzak LM-25 RFT +861Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT Blizzak WS90 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 69 56 Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 69.4 = 69
Blizzak WS90: 40% × 68.3 + 60% × 55.7 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison63Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT Blizzak WS90 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 70 Reviews found online – 51 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 51.3 = 63
-
70
Treadwear
Blizzak LM-25 RFT +961Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT Blizzak WS90 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 72 58 Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70
Blizzak WS90: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak WS90. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Blizzak LM-25 RFT +662Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT Blizzak WS90 Reviews found online 68 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 68 |
| Dry | 70 | 73 |
| Wet | 77 | 67 |
| Snow | 75 | 73 |
| Comfort | 69 | 61 |
| Noise | – | 63 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Blizzak WS90
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep, fresh, or compacted snow and ice
- Transforms rear-wheel-drive vehicles into capable winter drivers
- Softer, quieter, and more comfortable ride compared to standard summer run-flat tires
Cons
- Longer braking distances on dry roads when temperatures rise above freezing
- Reduced braking performance and handling when temperatures exceed 20 degrees Celsius
- Prone to ABS and ESP activation on slick ice surfaces
Tire B Blizzak WS90
Pros
- Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
- Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
- Strong capability in slush and deep snow
Cons
- Increased road noise during highway driving
- Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
- Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT | B · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 45 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT — better wet, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 if dry matters most to you. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 77 vs 67 on wet.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 70 vs 61 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 69 vs 61 on comfort.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 68 vs 62 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak WS90?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak WS90?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 77 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak WS90?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak WS90?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak WS90?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 69 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Blizzak WS90?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 70 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology