Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 8 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS is ahead, 76–70
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 3 tests Owners 79 · 6,409 reviews
“Continental ContiProContact vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus? I bought a set of OEM wheels off an 11th gen for my 10th gen. I intended on running with the tires on them now for a while, but I found a tear in the sidewall on the inside of the wheel. Upon inspection I don’t think it’s safe to use, so I may replace 2 tires for the time being if I stuck with the same tires on it now (the ContiProContacts). However - years ago I considered the DWS 06 for my old 10th gen, and the guy at the shop told me it would be a rougher ride than the ContiProContacts, so I had went with those again. My current 10th gen has them also, and they are very due for replacement. I got the wheels because I want to go from 17x7 to 18x8. My car is also lowered with Eibach Sportline springs, so I already feel more bumps than you normally would. The ContiProContacts have been pretty good to me but are the DWS 06 better? I’d love better grip and handling but if it’s an even bumper ride then I’m not sure. Also I’m not sure if these tires will handle a little differently in terms of the ride anyway because of the difference in tire size that I’m used to now vs the new wheels. Also I know people love to recommend the Michelin Pilots, but I’m on a bit more of a budget and all the ratings I’ve read suggest the DWS 06 might be a budget version of the Pilots.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +979Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online 71 85 -
75
Wet
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +479Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) – 74 Reviews found online 77 87 -
73
Snow
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +376Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) – 79 Reviews found online 75 71 -
68
Comfort
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +977Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online 68 81 -
66
Noise
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +874Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) – 71 Reviews found online 66 77 -
67
Treadwear
Level67Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Reviews found online 68 69 -
69
Handling
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS +1180Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Reviews found online 69 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 76 |
| Dry | 70 | 79 |
| Wet | 75 | 79 |
| Snow | 73 | 76 |
| Comfort | 68 | 77 |
| Noise | 66 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 67 |
| Handling | 69 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Blizzak LM-25 RFT
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep, fresh, or compacted snow and ice
- Transforms rear-wheel-drive vehicles into capable winter drivers
- Softer, quieter, and more comfortable ride compared to standard summer run-flat tires
Cons
- Longer braking distances on dry roads when temperatures rise above freezing
- Reduced braking performance and handling when temperatures exceed 20 degrees Celsius
- Prone to ABS and ESP activation on slick ice surfaces
Tire B ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Pros
- Exceptional wet traction and resistance to hydroplaning
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality that transforms vehicle dynamics
- Strong dry grip and responsive, predictable cornering capabilities
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter-than-expected lifespan for some drivers
- Increased road noise and drone developing as the tires wear down
- Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a 'squishy' feel
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Community opinion on the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus is overwhelmingly positive, with users frequently praising its superior ride comfort, reduced road noise, and enhanced wet/light snow traction compared to factory summer or stock all-season tires. Drivers note an improved daily driving experience with strong dry and wet grip, though a few express curiosity about long-term tread wear or minor high-speed noises.
“I'm late to the game on this. My Michelin Primacy MXM OEM tires badly need replacing at 14k. I did rotate but don't drive that much, only by chance did I notice my fronts were very close to being bald. Now looking for something that will be durable and kind of jealous hearing ppl saying the only got 28k! Updated because I'm buying Continental ExtremeContact DWS06 Plus and reading the reviews and watching the tire review channel they seem to be stellar tires. I forgot I did rotate when I had Tesla come out to fix my wifi card.”
“I’m running the Conti ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus (say that 3 times fast!) all seasons in MA. Last year was my first winter with them, passed with flying colors and much better than the Pirelli Scorpions on my F15 with the N55 and a light tune. If you’re running summer tires you’ll either want to swap for these for year round or go with a dedicated summer / winter setup. I don’t like going that route as you know we can have mild winter weeks or months in New England and I don’t want to be forced to drive on winter tires for half of the year waiting for winter to come.”
“2019 FiST (US) on Turbomac's(Asphalt black) 17s with 215/45 Continental extreme contact DWS 06 plus. Stock suspension”
Based on 43 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT | B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 120 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 560 - 740 A - AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 80 vs 69 on handling.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 79 vs 70 on dry.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 77 vs 68 on comfort.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS scores 74 vs 66 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.