tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT vs Cooper Discoverer H/T Plus — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 34 owner reviews. How we score

Blizzak LM-25 RFT is ahead, 70–59

Check price on Amazon · Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer H/T Plus on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTDiscoverer H/T Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6862

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68

    Discoverer H/T Plus: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 64

    No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Discoverer H/T Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +15
    60
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTDiscoverer H/T Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7756

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 75

    Discoverer H/T Plus: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 60

    No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Discoverer H/T Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 76

    Snow

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +22
    54
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTDiscoverer H/T Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online7943

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 79 = 76

    Discoverer H/T Plus: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 42.8 = 54

    No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Discoverer H/T Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTDiscoverer H/T Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6559

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.7 = 66

    Discoverer H/T Plus: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 58.6 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Discoverer H/T Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 63

    Noise

    Discoverer H/T Plus +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTDiscoverer H/T Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5961

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 63

    Discoverer H/T Plus: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer H/T Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +17
    51
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTDiscoverer H/T Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online6941

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 68

    Discoverer H/T Plus: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 41 = 51

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Discoverer H/T Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +13
    53
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTDiscoverer H/T Plus
    Reviews found online6653
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFTCooper Discoverer H/T Plus
Relative Score 70 59
Dry 68 64
Wet 75 60
Snow 76 54
Comfort 66 62
Noise 63 64
Treadwear 68 51
Handling (owners) 66 53

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Blizzak LM-25 RFT

± 8

Discoverer H/T Plus

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM-25 RFT

Pros

  • Outstanding traction and grip in deep, fresh, and compacted snow
  • Exceptional ice performance and handling on steep inclines in freezing temperatures
  • Effective slush dispersal and wet weather performance

Cons

  • Significantly longer braking distances on dry roads when temperatures rise above 20°C
  • Reduced braking performance in wet conditions if ambient temperatures are too high
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-25 RFT review

Tire B Discoverer H/T Plus

Pros

  • Smooth and quiet highway ride quality
  • Strong wet and dry traction, including dependable performance in rain
  • Attractive and somewhat aggressive tread design that enhances truck appearance

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users, failing to meet expected mileage warranties
  • Slight decrease in fuel economy noted by a few drivers
  • Occasional minor increase in road noise compared to previous tires on specific setups
All owner themes in the Discoverer H/T Plus review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT B · Cooper Discoverer H/T Plus
CategoryWinterAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available32
Rim diameters17″ – 20″18″ – 20″
Tread depth11/32″12/32″
UTQG—460 A B
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT

Cooper Discoverer H/T Plus

Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT — better snow, treadwear and wet. Where the Cooper Discoverer H/T Plus is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 76 vs 54 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 68 vs 51 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 75 vs 60 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 66 vs 53 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Cooper Discoverer H/T Plus
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer H/T Plus?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer H/T Plus?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 75 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer H/T Plus?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 68 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer H/T Plus?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 76 vs 54 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer H/T Plus?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer H/T Plus?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 66 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer H/T Plus?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 68 vs 51 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology