tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT vs General Altimax Arctic 12 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 9 + 33 owner reviews. How we score

Blizzak LM-25 RFT is ahead, 71–66

Check price on Amazon · Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Altimax Arctic 12 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +19
    49
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAltimax Arctic 12
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)47
    Reviews found online6853

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68

    Altimax Arctic 12: 60% × 47.2 + 40% × 52.9 = 49

    No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAltimax Arctic 12
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 74 (est.)66
    Reviews found online7772

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 75

    Altimax Arctic 12: 60% × 65.9 + 40% × 72.3 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 76

    Snow

    Level
    76
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAltimax Arctic 12
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 73 (est.)74
    Reviews found online7980

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 79 = 76

    Altimax Arctic 12: 60% × 74 + 40% × 79.8 = 76

    No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAltimax Arctic 12
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)69
    Reviews found online6562

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.7 = 66

    Altimax Arctic 12: 40% × 68.8 + 60% × 62 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 63

    Noise

    Altimax Arctic 12 +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAltimax Arctic 12
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)72
    Reviews found online5963

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 63

    Altimax Arctic 12: 60% × 72.3 + 40% × 62.7 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    Altimax Arctic 12 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAltimax Arctic 12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6974

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 68

    Altimax Arctic 12: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Altimax Arctic 12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAltimax Arctic 12
    Reviews found online6665
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFTGeneral Altimax Arctic 12
Relative Score 71 66
Dry 68 49
Wet 75 68
Snow 76 76
Comfort 66 65
Noise 63 68
Treadwear 68 71
Handling (owners) 66 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Blizzak LM-25 RFT

± 7

Altimax Arctic 12

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM-25 RFT

Pros

  • Outstanding traction and grip in deep, fresh, and compacted snow
  • Exceptional ice performance and handling on steep inclines in freezing temperatures
  • Effective slush dispersal and wet weather performance

Cons

  • Significantly longer braking distances on dry roads when temperatures rise above 20°C
  • Reduced braking performance in wet conditions if ambient temperatures are too high
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-25 RFT review

Tire B Altimax Arctic 12

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and traction in heavy snow, slush, and ice
  • Excellent value and affordable price point compared to premium winter tires
  • Impressive tread life and long-term durability across multiple winter seasons

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise, which can increase as the tires wear
  • Slightly soft, squishy, or vague handling characteristics on dry pavement
  • Higher rolling resistance resulting in a minor decrease in fuel economy
All owner themes in the Altimax Arctic 12 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT B · General Altimax Arctic 12
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available338
Rim diameters17″ – 20″15″ – 19″
Tread depth11/32″12/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT

General Altimax Arctic 12

Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT — better dry and wet. Pick the General Altimax Arctic 12 if noise and treadwear matter most to you. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 68 vs 49 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 75 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

General Altimax Arctic 12 scores 68 vs 63 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

General Altimax Arctic 12 scores 71 vs 68 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Altimax Arctic 12
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Altimax Arctic 12?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Altimax Arctic 12?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 75 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Altimax Arctic 12?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 68 vs 49 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Altimax Arctic 12?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 76 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Altimax Arctic 12?

General Altimax Arctic 12, 68 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Altimax Arctic 12?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Altimax Arctic 12?

General Altimax Arctic 12, 71 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology