Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Agilis CrossClimate is ahead, 76–70

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire BMichelin

Agilis CrossClimate

All Season

Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 81 · 1,066 reviews

“Costco tire employee here- It can be hard to estimate tire life w/out warranty info. Most members see about 60k miles on the agilis crossclimate and 75k on the defender ltx. The agilis is the better tire for heavy loading but you have to balance that against how fast you'll wear them out. Both are great tires though”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Agilis CrossClimate +7
    77
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score)–71
    Reviews found online7185
  2. 75

    Wet

    Agilis CrossClimate +2
    77
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score)–71
    Reviews found online7784
  3. 73

    Snow

    Agilis CrossClimate +3
    76
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score)–75
    Reviews found online7579
  4. 68

    Comfort

    Agilis CrossClimate +6
    74
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAgilis CrossClimate
    Reviews found online6879
  5. 66

    Noise

    Agilis CrossClimate +8
    74
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score)–73
    Reviews found online6676
  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Agilis CrossClimate +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAgilis CrossClimate
    Reviews found online6877
  7. 69

    Handling

    Agilis CrossClimate +11
    80
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAgilis CrossClimate
    Reviews found online6980
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFTMichelin Agilis CrossClimate
Relative Score 70 76
Dry 70 77
Wet 75 77
Snow 73 76
Comfort 68 74
Noise 66 74
Treadwear 67 72
Handling 69 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Blizzak LM-25 RFT

Agilis CrossClimate

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM-25 RFT

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep, fresh, or compacted snow and ice
  • Transforms rear-wheel-drive vehicles into capable winter drivers
  • Softer, quieter, and more comfortable ride compared to standard summer run-flat tires

Cons

  • Longer braking distances on dry roads when temperatures rise above freezing
  • Reduced braking performance and handling when temperatures exceed 20 degrees Celsius
  • Prone to ABS and ESP activation on slick ice surfaces
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-25 RFT review

Tire B Agilis CrossClimate

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling

Cons

  • Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
  • Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
  • A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
All owner themes in the Agilis CrossClimate review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Mixed

Community opinion on the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is generally positive regarding its heavy-load capacity, wet traction, and snow performance for vans and trucks, though users note concerns about rolling resistance, wear rates compared to standard LTX tires, and past recall notices.

r/Finland ·2024-10-16

“Lapland - Tyre Advice - Michelin Agilis Crossclimate Grateful for the knowledge/experience of the good people of r/Finland . I ordinarily use studded tyres for my van, but planning a roadtrip down to Germany/France over the new year (so can't fit these). I've no experience with friction tyres on snow/ice, but have Michelin Agilis Crossclimate [ . These have the 3PMSF marking so I understand are technically legal in Finland for winter, but I'm not sure about safety/performance in Lapland (route being: Tornio, to Sweden and then down via Denmark.) Good to hear people's views, or if you've experience with these types of tyres in this environment? UPDATE: Really appreciate the comments and views put forward on this. By the debate it seems I’m not alone in being not clear about winter performance of a tyre rated 3PMSF but not a “true” Nordic friction tyre. It does not make economic sense to buy new winter friction tyres for a road trip. So thinking about packing the Michelins, driving the studded tyre and getting them swapped/stored in Denmark or South Sweden and then swapping back on return. A pain in ass, a waste of space but the least risky approach. If anyone’s done similar let me know your experience.”

r/BoltEV ·5 upvotes ·2025-10-19

“Anyone tried Michelin Agilis CrossClimate tires on a Bolt? Following the info from I have picked up some used 15" Sonic wheels for winter use here in Maine. I can get Michelin Ice snow tires in an equivalent 15" size (to match the circumference of the stock tire/wheel) but not Cross Climate 2s. However, this Agilis is available in a near equivalent. It appears to be a heavier tire designed primarily for delivery vans Google AI suggests it has a slightly higher rolling resistance to the CC2s, which many report to have about a 10% hit on range - although any new tire will be less efficient than a well-worn one, so we should take that info with a grain of salt The Michelin Energy Saver tires are obviously more efficient, but also rated poor for use in snow. I'm a bit torn between "proper" snow tires and the Agilis, which I could run all year round One other factor is that smaller wheels tend to be more efficient - to a noticeable extent on EVs, so it just might be a wash as far as efficiency goes Read more”

r/Cartalk ·1 upvote ·2025-04-09

“Agilis Crossclimate vs Agilis LTX as a summer tire for a pickup? Daily driver Chevy 3/4 ton pickup. I've got a set of winter tires that I run from Nov-Mar but I need to replace my summer tires. Mediterranean climate, so dry summers. 99% of my driving is city/highway, maybe 1-5 days per year on dry dirt roads. I'd like to go with the crossclimate since they're about $200 cheaper for the set. I guess the Defender LTX just got rebranded Agilis LTX. I know the Defender LTX is a very popular light truck tire. Y'all think I can get away with the crossclimate and save a couple hundred bucks? Read more”

Top themes
#Winter and Snow Traction#Commercial Van and Truck Use#Tread Wear and Longevity#Fuel Economy and Rolling Resistance#Recall History and Safety

Based on 10 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
CategoryWinterAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverVan
Sizes available—22
Rim diameters—15″ – 17″

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better handling, noise and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 80 vs 69 on handling.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 74 vs 66 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 77 vs 70 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 74 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Tire B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

76

Leads

Agilis CrossClimate

Amazon