tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 9 + 1,073 owner reviews. How we score

Agilis CrossClimate is ahead, 78–70

Check price on Amazon · Agilis CrossClimate or Blizzak LM-25 RFT on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Tire BMichelin

Agilis CrossClimate

All Season

± 6

Tests 72 · 3 tests Owners 85 · 1,073 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“We have the Agilis cross climates on our C-class 3.5t MH and have been utterly delighted with them. They’re quiet, really grippy and give a great ride. What’s not to like?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Agilis CrossClimate +11
    79
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 68 (est.)74
    Reviews found online6887

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 87 = 79

    No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Agilis CrossClimate +3
    78
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 74 (est.)71
    Reviews found online7788

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 75

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 87.9 = 78

    No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 76

    Snow

    Agilis CrossClimate +2
    78
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 73 (est.)76
    Reviews found online7982

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 79 = 76

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 81.6 = 78

    No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Agilis CrossClimate +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)55
    Reviews found online6581

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.7 = 66

    Agilis CrossClimate: 40% × 54.7 + 60% × 81.1 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 63

    Noise

    Agilis CrossClimate +12
    75
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 66 (est.)82
    Reviews found online59≈ 66 (est.)

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 63

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 81.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 75

    No road tests of noise for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Agilis CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    Agilis CrossClimate +10
    78
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6985

    Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 68

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 78

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    Agilis CrossClimate +15
    81
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAgilis CrossClimate
    Reviews found online6681
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-25 RFTAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–71
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFTMichelin Agilis CrossClimate
Relative Score 70 78
Dry 68 79
Wet 75 78
Snow 76 78
Comfort 66 71
Noise 63 75
Treadwear 68 78
Handling (owners) 66 81
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Blizzak LM-25 RFT

± 6

Agilis CrossClimate

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM-25 RFT

Pros

  • Outstanding traction and grip in deep, fresh, and compacted snow
  • Exceptional ice performance and handling on steep inclines in freezing temperatures
  • Effective slush dispersal and wet weather performance

Cons

  • Significantly longer braking distances on dry roads when temperatures rise above 20°C
  • Reduced braking performance in wet conditions if ambient temperatures are too high
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-25 RFT review

Tire B Agilis CrossClimate

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling

Cons

  • Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
  • Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
  • A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
All owner themes in the Agilis CrossClimate review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is largely positive, with owners of vans, RVs, and heavy-duty trucks praising its wet and snow traction, quiet ride, and capability under heavy loads. However, discussions frequently highlight trade-offs such as faster tread wear compared to the Defender series and concerns regarding an NHTSA recall on certain C-metric sizes for snow traction marking non-compliance. Prospective buyers also note confusion regarding the differing directional C-metric and non-directional LT-metric designs.

r/Cartalk ·1 upvote ·2025-04-09

“Agilis Crossclimate vs Agilis LTX as a summer tire for a pickup? Daily driver Chevy 3/4 ton pickup. I've got a set of winter tires that I run from Nov-Mar but I need to replace my summer tires. Mediterranean climate, so dry summers. 99% of my driving is city/highway, maybe 1-5 days per year on dry dirt roads. I'd like to go with the crossclimate since they're about $200 cheaper for the set. I guess the Defender LTX just got rebranded Agilis LTX. I know the Defender LTX is a very popular light truck tire. Y'all think I can get away with the crossclimate and save a couple hundred bucks? Read more”
bobistheoilguy.com ·1 upvote ·2025-08-27

“I had a set on my Ford Transit 350 van. They were outstanding tires. IIRC I had them for maybe 20k miles. Wear seemed to be fine. But they were excellent in the wet and on snow and they were reasonably quiet. I never used them on anything more than wet grass and that van was terrible with traction on anything but the road, anyway, so I wouldn't evaluate a tire on grass or soft ground based on it.”
r/BoltEV ·5 upvotes ·2025-10-19

“Anyone tried Michelin Agilis CrossClimate tires on a Bolt? Following the info from I have picked up some used 15" Sonic wheels for winter use here in Maine. I can get Michelin Ice snow tires in an equivalent 15" size (to match the circumference of the stock tire/wheel) but not Cross Climate 2s. However, this Agilis is available in a near equivalent. It appears to be a heavier tire designed primarily for delivery vans Google AI suggests it has a slightly higher rolling resistance to the CC2s, which many report to have about a 10% hit on range - although any new tire will be less efficient than a well-worn one, so we should take that info with a grain of salt The Michelin Energy Saver tires are obviously more efficient, but also rated poor for use in snow. I'm a bit torn between "proper" snow tires and the Agilis, which I could run all year round One other factor is that smaller wheels tend to be more efficient - to a noticeable extent on EVs, so it just might be a wash as far as efficiency goes Read more”
Top themes
#Heavy load capability#Winter and snow traction#Tread wear longevity#Defender LTX comparison#C-metric recall notice#Ride comfort and noise#Van and RV use

Based on 54 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
CategoryWinterAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverVan
Sizes available322
Rim diameters17″ – 20″15″ – 17″
Tread depth11/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better handling, noise and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 81 vs 66 on handling.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 75 vs 63 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 79 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 68 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Agilis CrossClimate?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 75 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 79 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Agilis CrossClimate?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 78 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 75 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 71 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology