Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Too close to call: Blizzak LM-32 and Blizzak WS90 are level at 67.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM-32

Winter

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 20 reviews

Best test result: #9 of 13 in 2010 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Blizzak WS90

Winter

Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 64 · 21 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2022 Consumer Reports Winter Tires (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Blizzak WS90 +4
    72
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90
    Professional tests (TWG score)–84
    Reviews found online6854
  2. 69

    Wet

    Blizzak LM-32 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90
    Professional tests (TWG score)–65
    Reviews found online6969
  3. 68

    Snow

    Blizzak WS90 +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90
    Professional tests (TWG score)–69
    Reviews found online6778
  4. 67

    Comfort

    Blizzak LM-32 +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90
    Professional tests (TWG score)–68
    Reviews found online6459
  5. 66

    Noise

    Blizzak LM-32 +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90
    Professional tests (TWG score)–70
    Reviews found online6655
  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Blizzak LM-32 +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90
    Reviews found online6760
  7. 64

    Handling

    Blizzak LM-32 +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90
    Reviews found online6463
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Bridgestone Blizzak WS90: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-32Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Relative Score 67 67
Dry 68 72
Wet 69 67
Snow 68 73
Comfort 67 64
Noise 66 64
Treadwear 67 62
Handling 64 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Blizzak LM-32

Blizzak WS90

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90ΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 11% #9/13 · 2010 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/15 · 2022 Consumer Reports Winter Tires −88.9 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM-32

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and reliability in deep snow and winter storms
  • Stable and satisfying handling on cold, dry roads
  • Good resistance to aquaplaning and solid durability/tread life reported by some users

Cons

  • Poor and unpredictable wet weather grip, leading to wheel spin and sliding
  • Noticeable road noise and humming that increases as the tread wears down
  • Vague steering feel and lackluster performance under quick acceleration
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-32 review

Tire B Blizzak WS90

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
  • Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
  • Strong capability in slush and deep snow

Cons

  • Increased road noise during highway driving
  • Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
  • Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
All owner themes in the Blizzak WS90 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 B · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3545
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 19″
Tread depth—11/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90

Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 and Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 is stronger on treadwear and comfort. Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 is stronger on snow and dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 67 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 73 vs 68 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 72 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 67 vs 64 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

67

Too close to call

Blizzak LM-32

Amazon