tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 21 + 21 owner reviews. How we score

Blizzak WS90 leads, 68–65 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Blizzak WS90 or Blizzak LM-32 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Blizzak WS90 +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)85
    Reviews found online6354

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 65

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 54.1 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Blizzak WS90 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)66
    Reviews found online6469

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 65.6 + 40% × 68.5 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    Blizzak WS90 +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)69
    Reviews found online6379

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 66

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 78.5 = 73

    No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Level
    61
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)69
    Reviews found online5855

    Blizzak LM-32: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 61

    Blizzak WS90: 40% × 68.8 + 60% × 55.2 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 64

    Noise

    Blizzak LM-32 +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)70
    Reviews found online5951

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 64

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 51.1 = 63

    No road tests of noise for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Blizzak LM-32 +5
    61
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6658

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak WS90. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 59

    Handling (owners)

    Blizzak WS90 +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90
    Reviews found online5962
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-32Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Relative Score 65 68
Dry 65 73
Wet 65 67
Snow 66 73
Comfort 61 61
Noise 64 63
Treadwear 66 61
Handling (owners) 59 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Blizzak LM-32

± 7

Blizzak WS90

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak LM-32Blizzak WS90ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/10 2014 AMS Winter Tyre Test #8/10 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM-32

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and reliability in deep snow and winter storms
  • Stable and satisfying handling on cold, dry roads
  • Good resistance to aquaplaning and solid durability/tread life reported by some users

Cons

  • Poor and unpredictable wet weather grip, leading to wheel spin and sliding
  • Noticeable road noise and humming that increases as the tread wears down
  • Vague steering feel and lackluster performance under quick acceleration
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-32 review

Tire B Blizzak WS90

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
  • Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
  • Strong capability in slush and deep snow

Cons

  • Increased road noise during highway driving
  • Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
  • Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
All owner themes in the Blizzak WS90 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 B · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3645
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 19″
Tread depth11/32″11/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi44 psi
Sizes in common2020

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90

Narrow edge: Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 — better dry and snow. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 73 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 73 vs 66 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 66 vs 61 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak WS90?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak WS90?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak WS90?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 73 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak WS90?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 73 vs 66 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak WS90?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 63 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak WS90?

Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 61 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM-32 or Blizzak WS90?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32, 66 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology