Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Michelin CrossClimate SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

CrossClimate SUV is ahead, 74–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM-32

Winter

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 20 reviews

Best test result: #9 of 13 in 2010 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate SUV

All Season

Tests 81 · 4 tests Owners 72 · 23 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    CrossClimate SUV +13
    81
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32CrossClimate SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)–85
    Reviews found online6874
  2. 69

    Wet

    CrossClimate SUV +13
    82
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32CrossClimate SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)–84
    Reviews found online6979
  3. 68

    Snow

    CrossClimate SUV +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32CrossClimate SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)–69
    Reviews found online6672
  4. 67

    Comfort

    CrossClimate SUV +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32CrossClimate SUV
    Reviews found online6471
  5. 66

    Noise

    CrossClimate SUV +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32CrossClimate SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)–75
    Reviews found online6671
  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Blizzak LM-32 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32CrossClimate SUV
    Reviews found online6765
  7. 64

    Handling

    CrossClimate SUV +6
    70
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32CrossClimate SUV
    Reviews found online6470
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Michelin CrossClimate SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-32Michelin CrossClimate SUV
Relative Score 67 74
Dry 68 81
Wet 69 82
Snow 68 70
Comfort 67 70
Noise 66 73
Treadwear 67 65
Handling 64 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Blizzak LM-32

CrossClimate SUV

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak LM-32CrossClimate SUVΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 11% #9/13 · 2010 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test 50% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test −38.9 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM-32

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and reliability in deep snow and winter storms
  • Stable and satisfying handling on cold, dry roads
  • Good resistance to aquaplaning and solid durability/tread life reported by some users

Cons

  • Poor and unpredictable wet weather grip, leading to wheel spin and sliding
  • Noticeable road noise and humming that increases as the tread wears down
  • Vague steering feel and lackluster performance under quick acceleration
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-32 review

Tire B CrossClimate SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional all-weather traction, particularly in wet, cold, and light snow conditions.
  • High levels of ride comfort and low cabin noise for most users.
  • Strong durability and longevity with minimal tread wear reported by many owners.

Cons

  • Reports of increased road noise or 'growling' as the tire ages.
  • Ride quality can feel overly firm or harsh on certain vehicle suspensions.
  • Some users noted a decline in wet-weather performance as the tire reaches the end of its life.
All owner themes in the CrossClimate SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 B · Michelin CrossClimate SUV
CategoryWinterAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available3533
Rim diameters15″ – 20″16″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

Michelin CrossClimate SUV

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate SUV — better dry, wet and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 81 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 82 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 73 vs 66 on noise.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 70 vs 64 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

74

Leads

CrossClimate SUV

Amazon