Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 32 road tests and 3 + 113 owner reviews. How we score

Blizzak LM001 EVO leads, 69–67 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
± 7

Tests 69 · 3 tests Owners 68 · 3 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Blizzak LM005

Winter

± 5

Tests 73 · 32 tests Owners 59 · 113 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 54 in 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Blizzak LM005 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001 EVOBlizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 27 tests6677
    Reviews found online6856

    Blizzak LM001 EVO: 60% × 65.8 + 40% × 68.1 = 67

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 55.8 = 69

  2. 80

    Wet

    Blizzak LM005 +9
    89
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001 EVOBlizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 32 tests82100
    Reviews found online7572

    Blizzak LM001 EVO: 60% × 82.3 + 40% × 75.3 = 80

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 100 + 40% × 71.9 = 89

  3. 57

    Snow

    Blizzak LM005 +16
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001 EVOBlizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 32 tests5379
    Reviews found online6365

    Blizzak LM001 EVO: 60% × 53.1 + 40% × 63.3 = 57

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 64.7 = 73

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Blizzak LM001 EVO +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001 EVOBlizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 69 (est.)78
    Reviews found online6959

    Blizzak LM001 EVO: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 68.7 = 69

    Blizzak LM005: 40% × 78.2 + 60% × 59 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM001 EVO. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 77

    Noise

    Blizzak LM001 EVO +9
    68
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001 EVOBlizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 25 tests8469
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    Blizzak LM001 EVO: 60% × 83.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 77

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 68

    No owner ratings of noise for Blizzak LM001 EVO or Blizzak LM005. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Blizzak LM001 EVO +32
    37
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001 EVOBlizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 8 tests7234
    Reviews found online6541

    Blizzak LM001 EVO: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 65.1 = 69

    Blizzak LM005: 60% × 34 + 40% × 40.9 = 37

  7. 70

    Handling (owners)

    Blizzak LM001 EVO +9
    61
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001 EVOBlizzak LM005
    Reviews found online7061
  8. 73

    Efficiency

    Blizzak LM005 +9
    82
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001 EVOBlizzak LM005
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 27 tests7382
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM005: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVOBridgestone Blizzak LM005
Relative Score 69 67
Dry 67 69
Wet 80 89
Snow 57 73
Comfort 69 67
Noise 77 68
Treadwear 69 37
Handling (owners) 70 61
Efficiency 73 82

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Blizzak LM001 EVO

± 5

Blizzak LM005

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak LM001 EVOBlizzak LM005ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% #15/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 96% #10/16 · 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #18/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 97% #7/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% #3/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 99% #2/16 · 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #1/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/16 · 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 98% #10/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2024 Al Volante Crossover Winter Tire Test R18 – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 91% #20/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 93% #12/16 · 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 95% #20/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 84% #7/7 · 2024 Al Volante Crossover Winter Tire Test R18 – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #1/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 96% #15/16 · 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 60% #9/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 56% #16/16 · 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 87% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 88% #5/7 · 2024 Al Volante Crossover Winter Tire Test R18 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 85% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 85% #6/9 · 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #3/20 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test #18/20 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 76% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 36% #16/16 · 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #10/51 2018 51 Winter Tyre Shootout #8/16 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM001 EVO

Pros

  • Superb wet braking and performance in cold, wet conditions
  • Sharp and responsive steering feel
  • Very quiet operation when new

Cons

  • Fast tread wear, particularly in dry and warmer conditions
  • Below average snow performance and limited resistance to aquaplaning
  • Increased tire noise inside the cabin as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM001 EVO review

Tire B Blizzak LM005

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and braking performance on wet roads and heavy rain
  • High driving comfort with low interior noise levels when new
  • Predictable and stable handling characteristics in dry and mild winter conditions

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, with many users reporting the tire wearing out within 5,000 to 15,000 km
  • Noticeable degradation in snow and ice grip by the second or third season
  • Increased tire noise, whining, or humming vibrations as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM005 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available5165
Rim diameters15″ – 17″14″ – 22″
Tread depth—9/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common55

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Narrow edge: Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO — better treadwear, noise and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 if snow, wet and efficiency matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO scores 69 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 73 vs 57 on snow.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO scores 77 vs 68 on noise.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO scores 70 vs 61 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM001 EVO or Blizzak LM005?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM001 EVO or Blizzak LM005?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 89 vs 80 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM001 EVO or Blizzak LM005?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM001 EVO or Blizzak LM005?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 73 vs 57 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak LM001 EVO or Blizzak LM005?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO, 77 vs 68 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM001 EVO or Blizzak LM005?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM001 EVO or Blizzak LM005?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO, 69 vs 37 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Blizzak LM001 EVO or Blizzak LM005?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, 82 vs 73 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology