tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 vs Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 11 + 13 owner reviews. How we score

Blizzak LM001 is ahead, 59–47

Check price on Amazon · Blizzak LM001 or Ultra Grip Performance 2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
Tire ABridgestone

Blizzak LM001

Winter

± 7

Tests 71 · 2 tests Owners 47 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    Blizzak LM001 +13
    47
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests71≈ 54 (est.)
    Reviews found online4335

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 71.5 + 40% × 42.9 = 60

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 54.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.2 = 47

    No road tests of dry for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Blizzak LM001 +16
    49
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests75≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online5142

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 74.6 + 40% × 50.6 = 65

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 41.7 = 49

    No road tests of wet for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Snow

    Blizzak LM001 +19
    42
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests69≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online4924

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 68.5 + 40% × 49.2 = 61

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 53.3 (est.) + 40% × 24.2 = 42

    No road tests of snow for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 52

    Comfort

    Blizzak LM001 +1
    51
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4343

    Blizzak LM001: 40% × 64.4 (est.) + 60% × 43.1 = 52

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 42.8 = 51

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM001 or Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 54

    Noise

    Ultra Grip Performance 2 +4
    58
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests71≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online3044

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 29.5 = 54

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.2 = 58

    No road tests of noise for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 55

    Treadwear

    Blizzak LM001 +8
    47
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online4935

    Blizzak LM001: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 55.1 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 47

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 54

    Handling (owners)

    Blizzak LM001 +12
    42
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Reviews found online5442
  8. 71

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM001Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests71–
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM001Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2
Relative Score 59 47
Dry 60 47
Wet 65 49
Snow 61 42
Comfort 52 51
Noise 54 58
Treadwear 55 47
Handling (owners) 54 42
Efficiency 71 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Blizzak LM001

± 8

Ultra Grip Performance 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak LM001Ultra Grip Performance 2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #6/5 2022 Consumer Reports Performance Winter/Snow Tires #4/12 2011 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM001

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and icy conditions
  • Precise handling and stability on cold, winter-affected roads
  • Reliable braking performance in severe weather

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users
  • High noise levels on dry asphalt
  • Increased fuel consumption compared to other winter tires
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM001 review

Tire B Ultra Grip Performance 2

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on dry and wet tarmac
  • Agile handling and reliable grip in wet conditions and light-to-medium snow
  • Good directional tread design for effective water and slush evacuation

Cons

  • Severely lacking traction and grip on packed snow and ice according to dissatisfied users
  • Triggers frequent ABS activation and wheel spin during acceleration and braking in wintry precipitation
  • Vague handling feel on tarmac for certain drivers
All owner themes in the Ultra Grip Performance 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 B · Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available696
Rim diameters14″ – 21″16″ – 17″
Tread depth11/32″8/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi51 psi
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2

Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 — better snow, wet and dry. Pick the Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 if noise matters most to you. Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 scores 61 vs 42 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 scores 65 vs 49 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 scores 60 vs 47 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 scores 54 vs 42 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM001 or Ultra Grip Performance 2?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM001 or Ultra Grip Performance 2?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001, 65 vs 49 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM001 or Ultra Grip Performance 2?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001, 60 vs 47 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM001 or Ultra Grip Performance 2?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001, 61 vs 42 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak LM001 or Ultra Grip Performance 2?

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2, 58 vs 54 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM001 or Ultra Grip Performance 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 52 vs 51 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM001 or Ultra Grip Performance 2?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001, 55 vs 47 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology