Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 11 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 vs Continental WinterContact TS 860 S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 11 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
WinterContact TS 860 S is ahead, 75–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 80 · 16 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 11 in 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test (dry handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
WinterContact TS 860 S +1176Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 63 80 Blizzak LM25: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 65
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 73 + 40% × 79.5 = 76
No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
69
Wet
WinterContact TS 860 S +675Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 69 83 Blizzak LM25: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 70 + 40% × 82.9 = 75
No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
70
Snow
WinterContact TS 860 S +474Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 69 78 Blizzak LM25: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 70
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 70.5 + 40% × 78.1 = 74
No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
65
Comfort
WinterContact TS 860 S +1277Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 64 81 Blizzak LM25: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 64 = 65
WinterContact TS 860 S: 40% × 71.2 (est.) + 60% × 81.4 = 77
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for WinterContact TS 860 S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
62
Noise
WinterContact TS 860 S +971Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 57 ≈ 66 (est.) Blizzak LM25: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 62
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71
No road tests of noise for Blizzak LM25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for WinterContact TS 860 S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
65
Treadwear
WinterContact TS 860 S +1075Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 64 80 Blizzak LM25: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for WinterContact TS 860 S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
71
Handling (owners)
WinterContact TS 860 S +1384Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 WinterContact TS 860 S Reviews found online 71 84 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison77Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 | Continental WinterContact TS 860 S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 75 |
| Dry | 65 | 76 |
| Wet | 69 | 75 |
| Snow | 70 | 74 |
| Comfort | 65 | 77 |
| Noise | 62 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 84 |
| Efficiency | – | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Blizzak LM25
WinterContact TS 860 S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak LM25
Pros
- Excellent traction and handling in deep snow and winter storms
- Good grip and road holding in both dry and wet conditions during cold months
- Sporty feel and well-suited for high-powered rear-wheel-drive sedans and sports cars
Cons
- Can be slightly noisy or develop saw-tooth wear if not properly maintained
- Subpar braking performance on pure ice compared to deep snow
Tire B WinterContact TS 860 S
Pros
- Exceptional handling and grip in wet, dry, and snow conditions
- Stiff sidewalls providing precise road feedback and cornering stability
- Summer-tire-like driving dynamics and confidence at low temperatures
Cons
- Long break-in (scrub-in) period required before optimal grip is reached
- Lateral grip in wet conditions can occasionally feel lacking during sudden maneuvers
- High price point
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 | B · Continental WinterContact TS 860 S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 10 | 92 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 16″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 10 - 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860 S — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental WinterContact TS 860 S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S scores 84 vs 71 on handling.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S scores 77 vs 65 on comfort.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S scores 76 vs 65 on dry.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S scores 75 vs 65 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak LM25 or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM25 or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S, 75 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM25 or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S, 76 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM25 or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S, 74 vs 70 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Blizzak LM25 or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S, 71 vs 62 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM25 or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S, 77 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM25 or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S, 75 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology