tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 33 road tests and 11 + 21,726 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 88–67

Check price on Amazon · CrossClimate 2 or Blizzak LM25 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2

All Season

± 4

Tests 87 · 33 tests Owners 87 · 21,726 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)

“I have 60K miles on my 2019 Model X. The General is my 3rd set of tires, replacing the Michelin Cross Climate 2 that was on the car. In 200 miles, here is what I have learned so far with these General G-Max AS-07 Noise = The General is FAR superior than the Michelin Cross Climate. Matter of fact, the General is very close to the OEM Conti in this area Range = The General is running around 5% more in terms of efficiency (or lack of) compare to the OEM Conti and worn Michelin, but 5-10% more than my Michelin NEW. I only started getting the efficiency on the Michelin when the inside turned bald. Comfort = The ride is on par with the Michelin and OEM Conti, none really rode that great to begin with. Michelin was probably the best, the General is probably the worst but it isn't anything terrible. Performance = Sorry it is a Model X and it is my daily driver. I don't drive it hard enough to have any thoughts on it. Price = The General is less than $800 after rebate, Michelin and Conti are probably over $1500 at this point.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 +30
    95
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 31 tests≈ 66 (est.)99
    Reviews found online6388

    Blizzak LM25: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 65

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.2 + 40% × 88.3 = 95

    No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 69

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 +18
    87
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 31 tests≈ 70 (est.)83
    Reviews found online6992

    Blizzak LM25: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 91.7 = 87

    No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 +20
    90
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 27 tests≈ 70 (est.)99
    Reviews found online6978

    Blizzak LM25: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 70

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.6 + 40% × 78.2 = 90

    No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 +14
    79
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 68 (est.)67
    Reviews found online6486

    Blizzak LM25: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 64 = 65

    CrossClimate 2: 40% × 67.2 + 60% × 86.1 = 79

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 62

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 +17
    79
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 66 (est.)77
    Reviews found online5783

    Blizzak LM25: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 62

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 77.2 + 40% × 82.7 = 79

    No road tests of noise for Blizzak LM25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 +19
    84
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests≈ 66 (est.)81
    Reviews found online6488

    Blizzak LM25: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88 = 84

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 +11
    82
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25CrossClimate 2
    Reviews found online7182
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    90
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests–90
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM25Michelin CrossClimate 2
Relative Score 67 88
Dry 65 95
Wet 69 87
Snow 70 90
Comfort 65 79
Noise 62 79
Treadwear 65 84
Handling (owners) 71 82
Efficiency – 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Blizzak LM25

± 4

CrossClimate 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM25

Pros

  • Excellent traction and handling in deep snow and winter storms
  • Good grip and road holding in both dry and wet conditions during cold months
  • Sporty feel and well-suited for high-powered rear-wheel-drive sedans and sports cars

Cons

  • Can be slightly noisy or develop saw-tooth wear if not properly maintained
  • Subpar braking performance on pure ice compared to deep snow
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM25 review

Tire B CrossClimate 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
  • Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
  • Long-lasting tread wear and durability

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price
  • Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
  • Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Positive

The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.

r/LexusNX ·55 upvotes ·2026-06-14

“CrossClimate2 in. Alenza Run Flats out. Swapped the Alenza run flats for CrossClimate2 all-weather tires. Sharper handling. Better ride comfort. Very quiet after an initial break-in period. Just make sure the tire pressure is as recommended on the door sill sticker, shop techs don’t always check. I’m an early adopter of CC2 tires, been using them on my old Jeep since 2022, super durable and perfect for inclement weather, still had some tread remaining at the 60k-mile warranty mark.”
macheforum.com ·8 upvotes ·2021-06-28

“I have the 235 that is a little higher load rating (105 vs 103 stock and 99 for 225). I'm probably getting about a 10% range reduction, but worth it to me for the improved handling and lower braking distance. I work from home and I charge to 90% about once a week unless taking a longer drive. If I did a lot of longer trips it might be an issue, but I am very happy with these tires.”
r/Ioniq5 ·2 upvotes ·2025-07-26

“I got my new to me 2022 Ultimate RWD in May this year, the tyres were all crap so I went to CrossClimate 2s on all 4 wheels. I can’t tell you what it was doing beforehand but I get 3.7mi/kWh around town and 3.2mi/kWh on the motorway now. I have a fairly heavy right foot, but at 100% charge it shows 270ish miles but mine is an early 72kWh battery so bear that in mind.”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design

Based on 762 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
CategoryWinterAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1092
Rim diameters16″ – 20″15″ – 21″
Tread depth11/32″9 - 10/32″
UTQG—640 B A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure51 psi50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common99

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better dry, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 90 vs 70 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 84 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 87 vs 69 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM25 or CrossClimate 2?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM25 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 87 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM25 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM25 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 90 vs 70 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak LM25 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 79 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM25 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 79 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM25 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology