tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 vs Continental TrueContact Tour — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 19 owner reviews. How we score

TrueContact Tour is ahead, 80–61

Check price on Amazon · TrueContact Tour or Blizzak LM30 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    TrueContact Tour +17
    78
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM30TrueContact Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online5783

    Blizzak LM30: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 57.2 = 61

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 74.3 (est.) + 40% × 82.9 = 78

    No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM30. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 64

    Wet

    TrueContact Tour +19
    83
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM30TrueContact Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 80 (est.)
    Reviews found online6288

    Blizzak LM30: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 62 = 64

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 80.2 (est.) + 40% × 87.8 = 83

    No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM30. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM30TrueContact Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online–69

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 70

    No road tests of snow for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    TrueContact Tour +17
    76
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM30TrueContact Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5580

    Blizzak LM30: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 54.7 = 59

    TrueContact Tour: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 79.7 = 76

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM30 or TrueContact Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM30TrueContact Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–83

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 82.8 = 73

    No road tests of noise for TrueContact Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    TrueContact Tour +15
    78
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM30TrueContact Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6086

    Blizzak LM30: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63

    TrueContact Tour: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 86 = 78

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM30. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for TrueContact Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    TrueContact Tour +30
    81
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM30TrueContact Tour
    Reviews found online5181
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM30Continental TrueContact Tour
Relative Score 61 80
Dry 61 78
Wet 64 83
Snow – 70
Comfort 59 76
Noise – 73
Treadwear 63 78
Handling (owners) 51 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Blizzak LM30

± 8

TrueContact Tour

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM30

Pros

  • Strong performance in deep snow and slushy conditions
  • Excellent resistance to aquaplaning in heavy rain
  • Progressive breakaway characteristics in dry, cold conditions

Cons

  • Inconsistent grip on greasy or thawed road surfaces
  • Faster than expected tread wear for some users
  • Higher noise levels compared to summer tires
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM30 review

Tire B TrueContact Tour

Pros

  • Extremely low road noise and a comfortable ride quality that absorbs bumps well
  • Impressive tread life and overall mileage durability
  • Reliable wet weather grip and cornering confidence

Cons

  • Some users reported a noticeable drop in fuel economy
  • Desire for improved water displacement grooves to better handle heavy rain
  • Limited performance in deep winter or heavy snow conditions
All owner themes in the TrueContact Tour review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 B · Continental TrueContact Tour
CategoryWinterAll Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available31
Rim diameters14″ – 16″16″
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—700 - 800 A A - B
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - White Wall
Max pressure—44 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM30

Continental TrueContact Tour

Winner: Continental TrueContact Tour — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental TrueContact Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 81 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 83 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 78 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Continental TrueContact Tour scores 76 vs 59 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM30
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental TrueContact Tour
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM30 or TrueContact Tour?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM30 or TrueContact Tour?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 83 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM30 or TrueContact Tour?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 78 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM30 or TrueContact Tour?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 76 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM30 or TrueContact Tour?

Continental TrueContact Tour, 78 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology