Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 45 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 vs Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 45 + 32 owner reviews. How we score
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus leads, 72–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 74 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus +773Why this score
Source Blizzak WS80 Dueler H/L Alenza Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 64 77 Blizzak WS80: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73
No road tests of dry for Blizzak WS80. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus +274Why this score
Source Blizzak WS80 Dueler H/L Alenza Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 73 75 Blizzak WS80: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 72
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 74
No road tests of wet for Blizzak WS80. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
77
Snow
Blizzak WS80 +770Why this score
Source Blizzak WS80 Dueler H/L Alenza Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 82 69 Blizzak WS80: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 77
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70
No road tests of snow for Blizzak WS80. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
68
Comfort
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus +674Why this score
Source Blizzak WS80 Dueler H/L Alenza Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 68 76 Blizzak WS80: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 68.2 = 68
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 76.2 = 74
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak WS80. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
65
Noise
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus +469Why this score
Source Blizzak WS80 Dueler H/L Alenza Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 64 72 Blizzak WS80: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 69
No road tests of noise for Blizzak WS80 or Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus +572Why this score
Source Blizzak WS80 Dueler H/L Alenza Plus Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 67 76 Blizzak WS80: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 69.5 + 40% × 76.3 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak WS80. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus +371Why this score
Source Blizzak WS80 Dueler H/L Alenza Plus Reviews found online 68 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 | Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 72 |
| Dry | 66 | 73 |
| Wet | 72 | 74 |
| Snow | 77 | 70 |
| Comfort | 68 | 74 |
| Noise | 65 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Blizzak WS80
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Blizzak WS80 | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/9 2018 Autofil Studless Winter Tire Test R16 | #6/13 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak WS80
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow, slush, and ice
- High confidence and safety during severe winter weather and mountain driving
- Surprisingly low road noise on dry and wet pavement
Cons
- Reduced fuel economy / lower gas mileage
- Slightly squishy handling and reduced braking performance on dry roads
- May feel less responsive than standard all-season or newer model compounds in non-winter conditions
Tire B Dueler H/L Alenza Plus
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Very low road noise and smooth ride quality
- Strong handling and stability on dry pavement
Cons
- Potential for reduced traction on wet surfaces
- Occasional reports of slight decreases in fuel economy
- Mixed feedback regarding performance in heavy winter conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 | B · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 21 | 3 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 17″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 13/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 800 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 80,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS80
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus — better dry, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 if snow matters most to you.
Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 scores 77 vs 70 on snow.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus scores 73 vs 66 on dry.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus scores 74 vs 68 on comfort.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus scores 72 vs 67 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak WS80 or Dueler H/L Alenza Plus?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak WS80 or Dueler H/L Alenza Plus?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak WS80 or Dueler H/L Alenza Plus?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus, 73 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak WS80 or Dueler H/L Alenza Plus?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS80, 77 vs 70 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Blizzak WS80 or Dueler H/L Alenza Plus?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus, 69 vs 65 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak WS80 or Dueler H/L Alenza Plus?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus, 74 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak WS80 or Dueler H/L Alenza Plus?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus, 72 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology