Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 5 road tests and 21 + 37 owner reviews. How we score

Blizzak WS90 leads, 68–65 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616
± 6

Tests 65 · 5 tests Owners 64 · 37 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 17 in 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 (exterior noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Blizzak WS90 +6
    67
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter I cept iZ2 W616
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests8571
    Reviews found online5560

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 85 + 40% × 55.1 = 73

    Winter I cept iZ2 W616: 60% × 71.3 + 40% × 60.2 = 67

  2. 67

    Wet

    Blizzak WS90 +4
    63
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter I cept iZ2 W616
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests6559
    Reviews found online6967

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 68.9 = 67

    Winter I cept iZ2 W616: 60% × 59.5 + 40% × 67.1 = 63

  3. 73

    Snow

    Blizzak WS90 +6
    67
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter I cept iZ2 W616
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests6958
    Reviews found online7979

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 69.1 + 40% × 79.1 = 73

    Winter I cept iZ2 W616: 60% × 58.1 + 40% × 79.1 = 67

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Winter I cept iZ2 W616 +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter I cept iZ2 W616
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests68≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5664

    Blizzak WS90: 40% × 68.5 + 60% × 56 = 61

    Winter I cept iZ2 W616: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 64.2 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Winter I cept iZ2 W616. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 63

    Noise

    Winter I cept iZ2 W616 +8
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter I cept iZ2 W616
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests7083
    Reviews found online5253

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 70.5 + 40% × 51.6 = 63

    Winter I cept iZ2 W616: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 52.8 = 71

  6. 61

    Treadwear

    Blizzak WS90 +2
    59
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter I cept iZ2 W616
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online5854

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61

    Winter I cept iZ2 W616: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 54 = 59

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak WS90. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Winter I cept iZ2 W616. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Winter I cept iZ2 W616 +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter I cept iZ2 W616
    Reviews found online6267
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90Winter I cept iZ2 W616
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–76
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak WS90Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616
Relative Score 68 65
Dry 73 67
Wet 67 63
Snow 73 67
Comfort 61 66
Noise 63 71
Treadwear 61 59
Handling (owners) 62 67
Efficiency – 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Blizzak WS90

± 6

Winter I cept iZ2 W616

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 finished ahead 2 times and Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak WS90Winter I cept iZ2 W616ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #1/15 #4/15 – 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Winter Tires · 215/60R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak WS90

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
  • Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
  • Strong capability in slush and deep snow

Cons

  • Increased road noise during highway driving
  • Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
  • Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
All owner themes in the Blizzak WS90 review

Tire B Winter I cept iZ2 W616

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow, slush, and severe winter conditions
  • Low road noise, offering a much quieter ride than typical winter tires
  • High comfort levels and stable, predictable handling on cold dry or wet roads

Cons

  • Subpar performance or reduced traction on wet roads and heavy rain
  • Faster tread wear, particularly during aggressive driving or when used in warmer weather
  • Softer sidewalls can feel slightly edgy or less precise when pushed to the limit
All owner themes in the Winter I cept iZ2 W616 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 B · Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available452
Rim diameters15″ – 19″16″ – 18″
Tread depth11/32″10.5/32″
Treadwear warranty—40,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90

Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616

Narrow edge: Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 — better dry, snow and wet. Pick the Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 if noise and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 scores 71 vs 63 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 73 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 73 vs 67 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 scores 66 vs 61 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Tire B · Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak WS90 or Winter I cept iZ2 W616?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak WS90 or Winter I cept iZ2 W616?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 67 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak WS90 or Winter I cept iZ2 W616?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak WS90 or Winter I cept iZ2 W616?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 73 vs 67 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak WS90 or Winter I cept iZ2 W616?

Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616, 71 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak WS90 or Winter I cept iZ2 W616?

Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616, 66 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak WS90 or Winter I cept iZ2 W616?

Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 59 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology