Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 63 · 21 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP72 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 21 + 28 owner reviews. How we score
WinterCraft WP72 leads, 70–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 28 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Blizzak WS90 +865Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 WinterCraft WP72 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 85 ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 55 64 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 54.7 = 73
WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65
No road tests of dry for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
67
Wet
WinterCraft WP72 +774Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 WinterCraft WP72 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 66 ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 69 76 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 65.6 + 40% × 68.7 = 67
WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.6 = 74
No road tests of wet for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
73
Snow
Level73Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 WinterCraft WP72 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 69 ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 78 75 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 68.7 + 40% × 78.4 = 73
WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 73
No road tests of snow for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
WinterCraft WP72 +667Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 WinterCraft WP72 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 68 ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 56 65 Blizzak WS90: 40% × 68.3 + 60% × 55.8 = 61
WinterCraft WP72: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 67
No road tests of comfort for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Noise
WinterCraft WP72 +366Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 WinterCraft WP72 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 51 64 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 51.3 = 63
WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66
No road tests of noise for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
WinterCraft WP72 +970Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 WinterCraft WP72 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 58 73 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61
WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak WS90. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
62
Handling (owners)
WinterCraft WP72 +466Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 WinterCraft WP72 Reviews found online 62 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | Kumho WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 70 |
| Dry | 73 | 65 |
| Wet | 67 | 74 |
| Snow | 73 | 73 |
| Comfort | 61 | 67 |
| Noise | 63 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Blizzak WS90
WinterCraft WP72
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Blizzak WS90 | WinterCraft WP72 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/10 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | #2/2 2025 AutoView Winter Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak WS90
Pros
- Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
- Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
- Strong capability in slush and deep snow
Cons
- Increased road noise during highway driving
- Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
- Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
Tire B WinterCraft WP72
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and deep snow conditions
- Great value and budget-friendly pricing compared to tier-one premium brands
- Surprisingly low noise levels and high comfort for a winter tire
Cons
- Some users reported vague high-speed handling or a 'jelly' sidewall feel at speeds over 50-60 mph
- A few mentions of increased noise compared to standard all-season tires
- Potential for flat-spotting due to nylon cord construction, making balancing difficult for some
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | B · Kumho WinterCraft WP72 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 45 | 25 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | 18″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Kumho WinterCraft WP72
Narrow edge: Kumho WinterCraft WP72 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 if dry matters most to you.
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 scores 70 vs 61 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 73 vs 65 on dry.
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 scores 74 vs 67 on wet.
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 scores 67 vs 61 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak WS90 or WinterCraft WP72?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak WS90 or WinterCraft WP72?
Kumho WinterCraft WP72, 74 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak WS90 or WinterCraft WP72?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 73 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak WS90 or WinterCraft WP72?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Blizzak WS90 or WinterCraft WP72?
Kumho WinterCraft WP72, 66 vs 63 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak WS90 or WinterCraft WP72?
Kumho WinterCraft WP72, 67 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak WS90 or WinterCraft WP72?
Kumho WinterCraft WP72, 70 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology