Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs Laufenn I Fit Ice — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 21 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

Blizzak WS90 is ahead, 68–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn I Fit Ice
Tire BLaufenn

I Fit Ice

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 8 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Blizzak WS90 +15
    58
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90I Fit Ice
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests85≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online5452

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 54.1 = 73

    I Fit Ice: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 58

    No road tests of dry for I Fit Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Blizzak WS90 +9
    58
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90I Fit Ice
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests66≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6953

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 65.6 + 40% × 68.6 = 67

    I Fit Ice: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 58

    No road tests of wet for I Fit Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 73

    Snow

    Blizzak WS90 +8
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90I Fit Ice
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests69≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7962

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 78.5 = 73

    I Fit Ice: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of snow for I Fit Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Blizzak WS90 +4
    57
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90I Fit Ice
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests69≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5552

    Blizzak WS90: 40% × 68.8 + 60% × 55.2 = 61

    I Fit Ice: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.5 = 57

    No road tests of comfort for I Fit Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 63

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90I Fit Ice
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70–
    Reviews found online51–

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 50.9 = 63

  6. 61

    Treadwear

    Blizzak WS90 +12
    49
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90I Fit Ice
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online5838

    Blizzak WS90: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61

    I Fit Ice: 60% × 56.3 (est.) + 40% × 37.8 = 49

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak WS90. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for I Fit Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Blizzak WS90 +14
    48
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak WS90I Fit Ice
    Reviews found online6248
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs Laufenn I Fit Ice: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak WS90Laufenn I Fit Ice
Relative Score 68 58
Dry 73 58
Wet 67 58
Snow 73 65
Comfort 61 57
Noise 63 –
Treadwear 61 49
Handling (owners) 62 48

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Blizzak WS90

± 8

I Fit Ice

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 finished ahead 1 times and Laufenn I Fit Ice 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak WS90I Fit IceΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #1/17 #16/17 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Consumer Reports North America Winter Tyre Test · 215/60 R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak WS90

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
  • Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
  • Strong capability in slush and deep snow

Cons

  • Increased road noise during highway driving
  • Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
  • Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
All owner themes in the Blizzak WS90 review

Tire B I Fit Ice

Pros

  • Excellent traction and braking on compacted snow, deep snow, and ice
  • High value and budget-friendly price point
  • Surprisingly quiet and smooth ride for some users in cold conditions

Cons

  • Poor grip and dangerous slippage on wet roads and rain
  • Excessive road noise and humming
  • Subpar dry handling and soft feel during warmer temperatures
All owner themes in the I Fit Ice review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 B · Laufenn I Fit Ice
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available45—
Rim diameters15″ – 19″—
Tread depth11/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90

Laufenn I Fit Ice

Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 — better dry, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Laufenn I Fit Ice rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 73 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 62 vs 48 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 61 vs 49 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 67 vs 58 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Tire B · Laufenn I Fit Ice

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak WS90 or I Fit Ice?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak WS90 or I Fit Ice?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 67 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak WS90 or I Fit Ice?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 73 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak WS90 or I Fit Ice?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 73 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak WS90 or I Fit Ice?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 61 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak WS90 or I Fit Ice?

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 61 vs 49 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology