Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 56 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza vs Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 56 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Dueler H/L Alenza is ahead, 69–55
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 12 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Dueler H/L Alenza +1355Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza ControlContact Sport SRS+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 68 48 Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68
ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.8 = 55
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
Dueler H/L Alenza +1458Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza ControlContact Sport SRS+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 73 53 Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72
ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 58
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
Dueler H/L Alenza +958Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza ControlContact Sport SRS+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 64 49 Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 67
ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.3 = 58
No road tests of snow for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
68
Comfort
Dueler H/L Alenza +2246Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza ControlContact Sport SRS+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 68 35 Dueler H/L Alenza: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 68 = 68
ControlContact Sport SRS+: 40% × 61.8 (est.) + 60% × 34.9 = 46
No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
69
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza ControlContact Sport SRS+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 72 – Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 69
No road tests of noise for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Dueler H/L Alenza +1254Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza ControlContact Sport SRS+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 65 46 Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66
ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison43Why this score
Source Dueler H/L Alenza ControlContact Sport SRS+ Reviews found online – 43
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza | Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 55 |
| Dry | 68 | 55 |
| Wet | 72 | 58 |
| Snow | 67 | 58 |
| Comfort | 68 | 46 |
| Noise | 69 | – |
| Treadwear | 66 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 43 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Dueler H/L Alenza
55
/ 100
ControlContact Sport SRS+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dueler H/L Alenza
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B ControlContact Sport SRS+
Pros
- Strong dry and wet pavement traction
- Solid cornering stability and steering response
- Good value proposition for budget-conscious drivers
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin drone
- Noticeable vibration and harshness over uneven surfaces
- Inconsistent tread life reported by some users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza | B · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | — |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 260 A A | 560 A - AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | 40,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza
55
/ 100
Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+
Winner: Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza — better comfort, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 68 vs 46 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 72 vs 58 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 68 vs 55 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 66 vs 54 on treadwear.
Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza
Tire B · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dueler H/L Alenza or ControlContact Sport SRS+?
Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/L Alenza or ControlContact Sport SRS+?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 72 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/L Alenza or ControlContact Sport SRS+?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 68 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dueler H/L Alenza or ControlContact Sport SRS+?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 67 vs 58 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/L Alenza or ControlContact Sport SRS+?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 68 vs 46 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dueler H/L Alenza or ControlContact Sport SRS+?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 66 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology