tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza vs General Grabber UHP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 56 + 268 owner reviews. How we score

Dueler H/L Alenza is ahead, 69–62

Check price on Amazon · Dueler H/L Alenza or Grabber UHP on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Level
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/L AlenzaGrabber UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6867

    Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    Grabber UHP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Dueler H/L Alenza +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/L AlenzaGrabber UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7365

    Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72

    Grabber UHP: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    Dueler H/L Alenza +20
    46
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/L AlenzaGrabber UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online6430

    Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 66

    Grabber UHP: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 29.7 = 46

    No road tests of snow for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Dueler H/L Alenza +5
    63
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/L AlenzaGrabber UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6861

    Dueler H/L Alenza: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 68 = 68

    Grabber UHP: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.9 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    Dueler H/L Alenza +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/L AlenzaGrabber UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7261

    Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 69

    Grabber UHP: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Dueler H/L Alenza or Grabber UHP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Dueler H/L Alenza +8
    58
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/L AlenzaGrabber UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6552

    Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66

    Grabber UHP: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 58

    No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/L AlenzaGrabber UHP
    Reviews found online–63
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Dueler H/L AlenzaGeneral Grabber UHP
Relative Score 69 62
Dry 68 68
Wet 72 67
Snow 66 46
Comfort 68 63
Noise 69 64
Treadwear 66 58
Handling (owners) – 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Dueler H/L Alenza

± 7

Grabber UHP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dueler H/L Alenza

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Grabber UHP

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry grip with strong resistance to hydroplaning
  • High value for money compared to premium OE brands
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride quality on highways

Cons

  • Increased road noise as the tread wears down
  • Mixed performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
  • Some complaints regarding rapid wear or balancing issues on certain heavy vehicles
All owner themes in the Grabber UHP review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza B · General Grabber UHP
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available411
Rim diameters18″ – 22″15″ – 24″
Tread depth10/32″10/32″
UTQG260 A A320 - 360 A A
Treadwear warranty40,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza

General Grabber UHP

Winner: Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza — better snow, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 66 vs 46 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 66 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 72 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 68 vs 63 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber UHP
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dueler H/L Alenza or Grabber UHP?

Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/L Alenza or Grabber UHP?

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 72 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/L Alenza or Grabber UHP?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Dueler H/L Alenza or Grabber UHP?

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 66 vs 46 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Dueler H/L Alenza or Grabber UHP?

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 69 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/L Alenza or Grabber UHP?

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 68 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dueler H/L Alenza or Grabber UHP?

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 66 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology