Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 26 reviews
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 vs Firestone Destination A/T2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 26 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
Destination A/T2 is ahead, 72–65
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 73 · 9 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Destination A/T2 +369Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 684 Destination A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 65 70 Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 66
Destination A/T2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Destination A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
68
Wet
Destination A/T2 +1078Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 684 Destination A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 67 81 Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
Destination A/T2: 60% × 76.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.8 = 78
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Destination A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
Destination A/T2 +773Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 684 Destination A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 63 75 Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 66
Destination A/T2: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 73
No road tests of snow for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Destination A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
Destination A/T2 +672Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 684 Destination A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 64 74 Dueler H/T 684: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 64.3 = 66
Destination A/T2: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.8 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Destination A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
66
Noise
Destination A/T2 +369Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 684 Destination A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 65 72 Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 66
Destination A/T2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 69
No road tests of noise for Dueler H/T 684 or Destination A/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Treadwear
Destination A/T2 +1070Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 684 Destination A/T2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 57 69 Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 60
Destination A/T2: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 69 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Destination A/T2 +1072Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 684 Destination A/T2 Reviews found online 62 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 | Firestone Destination A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 72 |
| Dry | 66 | 69 |
| Wet | 68 | 78 |
| Snow | 66 | 73 |
| Comfort | 66 | 72 |
| Noise | 66 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Dueler H/T 684
Destination A/T2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dueler H/T 684
Pros
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality on paved roads
- Low noise levels during highway and city driving
- Good dry-road grip and stable handling at normal speeds
Cons
- Poor traction and slippery behavior in wet conditions
- Rapid tread wear and disappointing overall durability
- Inadequate off-road and mud performance
Tire B Destination A/T2
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather traction and grip
- Strong performance in snow with 3PMS rating
- Quiet and smooth ride quality at highway speeds
Cons
- Vague or unresponsive steering feedback
- Questionable durability on sharp rocks or rough forest service roads
- Stiffer ride compared to factory street tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 | B · Firestone Destination A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 2 | 33 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 10 - 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 300 B B | 540 - 560 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 55,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 - 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684
Firestone Destination A/T2
Winner: Firestone Destination A/T2 — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone Destination A/T2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Firestone Destination A/T2 scores 78 vs 68 on wet.
Firestone Destination A/T2 scores 70 vs 60 on treadwear.
Firestone Destination A/T2 scores 72 vs 62 on handling.
Firestone Destination A/T2 scores 73 vs 66 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dueler H/T 684 or Destination A/T2?
Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/T 684 or Destination A/T2?
Firestone Destination A/T2, 78 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/T 684 or Destination A/T2?
Firestone Destination A/T2, 69 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dueler H/T 684 or Destination A/T2?
Firestone Destination A/T2, 73 vs 66 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Dueler H/T 684 or Destination A/T2?
Firestone Destination A/T2, 69 vs 66 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/T 684 or Destination A/T2?
Firestone Destination A/T2, 72 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dueler H/T 684 or Destination A/T2?
Firestone Destination A/T2, 70 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology