tirewheelguide

Toyo NanoEnergy R38 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 vs Toyo NanoEnergy R38 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 26 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

NanoEnergy R38 leads, 70–67 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · NanoEnergy R38 or Dueler H/T 684 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo NanoEnergy R38
Tire BToyo

NanoEnergy R38

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 8 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    NanoEnergy R38 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6772

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 68

    NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 69

    Wet

    NanoEnergy R38 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6873

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69

    NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 67

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)–
    Reviews found online65–

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 67

    No road tests of snow for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    NanoEnergy R38 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6769

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/T 684 or NanoEnergy R38. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online68–

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    NanoEnergy R38 +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684NanoEnergy R38
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5965

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62

    NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    NanoEnergy R38 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684NanoEnergy R38
    Reviews found online6471
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Dueler H/T 684Toyo NanoEnergy R38
Relative Score 67 70
Dry 68 71
Wet 69 72
Snow 67 –
Comfort 68 69
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 62 65
Handling (owners) 64 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dueler H/T 684

NanoEnergy R38

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dueler H/T 684

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality on paved roads
  • Low noise levels during highway and city driving
  • Good dry-road grip and stable handling at normal speeds

Cons

  • Poor traction and slippery behavior in wet conditions
  • Rapid tread wear and disappointing overall durability
  • Inadequate off-road and mud performance
All owner themes in the Dueler H/T 684 review

Tire B NanoEnergy R38

Pros

  • Reliable wet and dry grip with predictable handling limits
  • Good value for money compared to premium brand alternatives
  • Solid longevity and mileage, with respectable tread wear reported

Cons

  • Slightly increased road noise reported by some users
  • Limited size or availability challenges noted by consumers wanting replacements
All owner themes in the NanoEnergy R38 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 B · Toyo NanoEnergy R38
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG300 B B—
SidewallBlackwall—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684

Toyo NanoEnergy R38

Narrow edge: Toyo NanoEnergy R38 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo NanoEnergy R38 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 71 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 71 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 72 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 65 vs 62 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy R38
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dueler H/T 684 or NanoEnergy R38?

Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/T 684 or NanoEnergy R38?

Toyo NanoEnergy R38, 72 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/T 684 or NanoEnergy R38?

Toyo NanoEnergy R38, 71 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/T 684 or NanoEnergy R38?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Dueler H/T 684 or NanoEnergy R38?

Toyo NanoEnergy R38, 65 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology