Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 26 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes ST is ahead, 71–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes ST
Tire BToyo

Proxes ST

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Proxes ST +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6574

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 66

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Proxes ST +7
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online6777

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    Proxes ST: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    Proxes ST +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6365

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 66

    Proxes ST: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 67

    No road tests of snow for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Proxes ST +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6472

    Dueler H/T 684: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 64.3 = 66

    Proxes ST: 40% × 69.4 (est.) + 60% × 72.2 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online65–

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 66

    No road tests of noise for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 60

    Treadwear

    Proxes ST +10
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5772

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 60

    Proxes ST: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes ST +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Proxes ST
    Reviews found online6268
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 vs Toyo Proxes ST: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Dueler H/T 684Toyo Proxes ST
Relative Score 65 71
Dry 66 72
Wet 68 75
Snow 66 67
Comfort 66 71
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 60 70
Handling (owners) 62 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Dueler H/T 684

± 8

Proxes ST

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dueler H/T 684

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality on paved roads
  • Low noise levels during highway and city driving
  • Good dry-road grip and stable handling at normal speeds

Cons

  • Poor traction and slippery behavior in wet conditions
  • Rapid tread wear and disappointing overall durability
  • Inadequate off-road and mud performance
All owner themes in the Dueler H/T 684 review

Tire B Proxes ST

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
  • Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
  • A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
  • Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
All owner themes in the Proxes ST review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 B · Toyo Proxes ST
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG300 B B—
SidewallBlackwall—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684

Toyo Proxes ST

Winner: Toyo Proxes ST — better treadwear, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes ST scores 70 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes ST scores 75 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes ST scores 68 vs 62 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684
Tire B · Toyo Proxes ST

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dueler H/T 684 or Proxes ST?

Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/T 684 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 75 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/T 684 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dueler H/T 684 or Proxes ST?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/T 684 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 71 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dueler H/T 684 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 70 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology