Tests 80 · 9 tests Owners 79 · 1,371 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)
“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 9 + 0 road tests and 1,371 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 4 SUV is ahead, 83–72
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
86
Dry
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +1472Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 4 SUV Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests 86 ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 86 75 Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 86 + 40% × 86.4 = 86
Proxes ST: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 72
No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
91
Wet
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +1675Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 4 SUV Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests 94 ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 87 77 Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 94 + 40% × 86.7 = 91
Proxes ST: 60% × 74.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 75
No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison67Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 4 SUV Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online – 65 Proxes ST: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 67
No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
64
Comfort
Proxes ST +872Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 4 SUV Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests 54 ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 71 73 Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 40% × 54.2 + 60% × 71.2 = 64
Proxes ST: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 72.8 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 4 SUV Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests 53 – Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) – Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 52.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 58
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
72
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +270Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 4 SUV Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 77 ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 65 72 Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 65.3 = 72
Proxes ST: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
83
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +1568Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 4 SUV Proxes ST Reviews found online 83 68 -
64
Efficiency
No comparison–Why this score
Source Pilot Sport 4 SUV Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests 64 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Toyo Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 72 |
| Dry | 86 | 72 |
| Wet | 91 | 75 |
| Snow | – | 67 |
| Comfort | 64 | 72 |
| Noise | 58 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 83 | 68 |
| Efficiency | 64 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
72
/ 100
Proxes ST
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Pros
- Outstanding grip and safety in both wet and dry conditions
- Precise steering response and enhanced cornering stability for heavy SUVs
- Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and overall handling
Cons
- Higher-than-average purchase price
- Increased road noise reported by some users as the tread wears down
- Faster tread wear and shorter mileage lifespan under aggressive driving or heavy vehicle loads
Tire B Proxes ST
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
- Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning
Cons
- Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
- A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
- Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Community sentiment toward the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV is generally very positive, with owners highlighting its strong grip, handling precision, and suitability for heavy performance SUVs. Users frequently compare it favorably to older Latitude Sport 3 and standard passenger tires, though they emphasize its summer-only limitation below 40°F and note trade-offs in price and tread life.
rennlist.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by robtr8 I like to use the tire size calculator on 1010Tires.com. Shows 285/40's as being almost 3% bigger than the OE size. Generally speaking you want no more than a 1% different. The PS 4 SUV's are available in a 295/35. Rocketcar - if you had P-Zero's then yup. They suck. Took them off the F Type immediately if not sooner. Quote: Originally Posted by RAudi Driver That's why they are called P-Zeros. If they were good Pirelli would have named them P-10's. Quote: Originally Posted by BrettIsAwesomer Not a fan of the LS3 on my Cayenne. They came on the car when I bought it but will replace with Pilot Sport 4 SUV later this year. There are some stretches of road where the surface conditions change and I get a terrible droning noise in the cabin with the LS3. However, in my Cayman with PS4S in the same areas you can barely tell the road surface changed. The wear on both sets is about the same. 2016 Cayenne S e-Hybrid with 21" Latitude Sport 3 (295/35) 2014 Cayman with 20" Pilot Sport 4S (235-265/35) I am putting an OPC warranty on the Cayenne, so for me the LS3 is is best N rated tyre available...”
r/Audi
·1 upvote ·2026-07-09
“Nope nope nope. I live in the SE and my RWD sports car get squirrelly with normal driving when it drops below 40 on my PS4Ss. You’d be in a ditch first bit of snow.”
r/PorscheMacan
·1 upvote ·2026-04-04
“I'm leaning towards the Pilot Sport 4 SUV over the LS3. I'd really like to see how much better these tires grip. Although it sounds like I'll be sacrificing a little comfort, but with air suspension I'm not too worried.”
Top themes
#Summer temperature limitations#Grip and handling performance#Tread life and wear#Comparison with Latitude Sport 3#Ride comfort and firmness#SUV-specific load design
Based on 37 community posts
Tire B
Toyo Proxes ST
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV | B · Toyo Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 65 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 23″ | 19″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
72
/ 100
Toyo Proxes ST
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Toyo Proxes ST if comfort matters most to you. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 91 vs 75 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 83 vs 68 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 86 vs 72 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 64 on comfort.
Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Tire B · Toyo Proxes ST
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes ST?
Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes ST?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 91 vs 75 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes ST?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 86 vs 72 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes ST?
Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 4 SUV or Proxes ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology