Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 26 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Dueler H/T 684 is ahead, 67–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Dueler H/T 684 +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6758

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 68

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Dueler H/T 684 +12
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6853

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 67

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)–
    Reviews found online65–

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 67

    No road tests of snow for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Dueler H/T 684 +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6762

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/T 684 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online68–

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5964

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    Dueler H/T 684 +6
    58
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online6458
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Dueler H/T 684Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 67 61
Dry 68 61
Wet 69 57
Snow 67 –
Comfort 68 65
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 62 65
Handling (owners) 64 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dueler H/T 684

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dueler H/T 684

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality on paved roads
  • Low noise levels during highway and city driving
  • Good dry-road grip and stable handling at normal speeds

Cons

  • Poor traction and slippery behavior in wet conditions
  • Rapid tread wear and disappointing overall durability
  • Inadequate off-road and mud performance
All owner themes in the Dueler H/T 684 review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG300 B B—
SidewallBlackwall—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Winner: Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth if treadwear matters most to you. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 scores 69 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 scores 68 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 scores 64 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 scores 68 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dueler H/T 684 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/T 684 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684, 69 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/T 684 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684, 68 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/T 684 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dueler H/T 684 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 65 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology