Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 434 reviews
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Kumho KL33 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 434 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: KL33 59, Geolandar G055 Blue Earth 60.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 12 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +161Why this score
Source KL33 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 56 57 KL33: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 60
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
No road tests of dry for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
63
Wet
KL33 +558Why this score
Source KL33 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 60 53 KL33: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 63
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 58
No road tests of wet for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Comfort
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +263Why this score
Source KL33 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 57 60 KL33: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 57.4 = 61
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 59.9 = 63
No road tests of comfort for KL33 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
52
Treadwear
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +1264Why this score
Source KL33 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 43 63 KL33: 60% × 58.1 (est.) + 40% × 43.2 = 52
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
58
Handling (owners)
KL33 +256Why this score
Source KL33 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Reviews found online 58 56
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho KL33 | Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 60 |
| Dry | 60 | 61 |
| Wet | 63 | 58 |
| Comfort | 61 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 56 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
KL33
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A KL33
Pros
- Good value for money with competitive pricing
- Strong initial dry and wet grip/traction
- Comfortable and smooth ride quality
Cons
- Premature tread wear and short lifespan
- Serious structural concerns including tread chipping, chunking, and delamination
- Road noise increases significantly as the tire wears down
Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Pros
- Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Adequate dry road grip and handling
Cons
- Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
- Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
- Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho KL33 | B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 18 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho KL33
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Too close to call: Kumho KL33 and Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth are within 2 points overall. Kumho KL33 is stronger on wet. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth is stronger on treadwear. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 64 vs 52 on treadwear.
Kumho KL33 scores 63 vs 58 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
KL33 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Which is better in the wet, KL33 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Kumho KL33, 63 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, KL33 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 61 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, KL33 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 63 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, KL33 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 64 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology