Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 1 + 2,192 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,192 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison74Why this score
Source Duravis R500 HD ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 78 Reviews found online – 67 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.3 = 74
-
–
Wet
No comparison68Why this score
Source Duravis R500 HD ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 70 Reviews found online – 64 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 64 = 68
-
–
Snow
No comparison34Why this score
Source Duravis R500 HD ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 49 (est.) Reviews found online – 13 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 49 (est.) + 40% × 12.7 = 34
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
–
Comfort
No comparison62Why this score
Source Duravis R500 HD ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 62 Reviews found online – 62 ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.5 + 60% × 61.5 = 62
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source Duravis R500 HD ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 75 Reviews found online – 60 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 60 = 69
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison69Why this score
Source Duravis R500 HD ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 75 Reviews found online – 59 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 59.3 = 69
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison72Why this score
Source Duravis R500 HD ADVAN Fleva V701 Reviews found online – 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source Duravis R500 HD ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 65 |
| Dry | – | 74 |
| Wet | – | 68 |
| Snow | – | 34 |
| Comfort | – | 62 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | – | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Duravis R500 HD
65
/ 100
ADVAN Fleva V701
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Duravis R500 HD
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
- Precise steering response and good road feedback
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
- Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.
alltrac.net
·2025-04-09
“Online reviews in general are such a crapshoot. So many times you see products with diametrically opposed opinions. It's tough to sift through to figure out what may be true for your own application/situation. I'm sure part of the reason less people buy the Vredestein is brand recognition. Like underscore...I would say I've never heard of them...other than that I have seen their brand as I've been looking for tires to go on my 15" OZ rally wheels. They had a tire in an uncommon 215-50-15. Since you have first hand experience that is positive, that's probably worth more than 99% of online reviews. I'll probably go with Yokohama Advan Fleva v701 in 205-55-15 eventually. I've seen glowing reviews for them and reviews that say they are garbage. I'd like to get Yokohama Advan HF Type-D for their period correctness, and because I just think they look cool ( and isn't that what's most important in a tire? ) ...but they are difficult to get in the States. Well, maybe not difficult, just costly. When I looked on Nengun, it was about $650 for shipping on a set of 4. Most UK & European suppliers I've found won't even ship them to the US. But I'm getting way off topic here.”
fiestastforum.com
·2022-11-30
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
r/Civic_Type_R
·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness
Based on 22 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 70 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD
65
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Only Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Duravis R500 HD
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology