Summer tire Updated October 2026

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 review

Relative score 60% tests + 40% owners

Owners 59 · 2,186 reviews analysed Road tests 73 · 6 tests

How scores work
Add your size for an exact match
/R

The Amazon link then searches this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is widely praised as an exceptional value-focused Ultra-High-Performance summer tire, offering impressive dry and wet grip that rivals top-tier competitors at a significantly lower price point. Users frequently highlight its comfortable ride quality, low road noise, and precise steering feedback, making it a popular choice for light sports cars and daily drivers alike.

Community sentiment Neutral Read the buzz
#daily driving suitability#treadwear and lifespan#budget summer performance#comparison to Michelin#steering feel and turn-in

Owners rate it 13.9 points lower than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews found online; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

How scores work
Relative score
0–100. Blends road tests (60%) and owner reviews (40%) category by category, the same way on every TireWheelGuide page. With only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from it, so the score stays closer to average. It needs at least one road test or five owner reviews.
Road tests
0–100 per score, from published tests, newer tests counting more. Each result is compared with every other tire in the same test, so a win against a strong field counts for more. The average tested tire gets 70, the best 100; with only one or two tests a tire stays nearer 70. The discipline rows show % of the best tire in that test.
Owner reviews
0–100 from the owner reviews we found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates and scaled like the road tests: the average tested tire gets 70. With only a few reviews a tire stays near the average.

By owner reviews

59/100

From 2,186 owner reviews analysed, scaled like the road tests: the average tested tire gets 70.

Would buy again 78%
Dry
Overall dry
68.5
Corner stability
69.8
Dry traction
70.3
Steering response
69.5
Wet
Overall wet
65.3
Wet traction
71.1
Snow & ice
Overall snow & ice
13.8
Comfort
Overall comfort
63.5
Noise
Overall noise
61.1
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
60.8
Handling
Overall handling
71.2

Own these tires? Write a review →

By road tests

73/100

Scaled across every tested tire: the average gets 70, the best 100.

Dry
77.1
Wet
70
Comfort
62.5
Noise
74.3
Treadwear
74.1
By discipline (% of best in test)
Dry Braking
82.8%
Dry Handling
35%
Wet Braking
36.1%
Wet Handling
25%
Straight Aquaplaning
30%
Inside Noise level
95%
Subjective Comfort
30%
Rolling Resistance
70%
Price
20%
Wear
35%

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 specs & sizes

Prices vary by size, so each one links out separately.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 2,186 owner reviews found online.

The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is widely praised as an exceptional value-focused Ultra-High-Performance summer tire, offering impressive dry and wet grip that rivals top-tier competitors at a significantly lower price point. Users frequently highlight its comfortable ride quality, low road noise, and precise steering feedback, making it a popular choice for light sports cars and daily drivers alike. While most reviewers report satisfaction with its road manners and handling, a minority note that the tread wear can be faster than expected under aggressive driving conditions.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback
  • High value and affordability compared to premium tier alternatives
  • Attractive tread design and sidewall appearance

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
  • Limited performance in very cold temperatures or near freezing conditions

Worth knowing

  • Extremely popular among Mazda Miata (MX-5) and Toyota MR2 Spyder owners, who praise the tire's ability to fit harder-to-find smaller enthusiast sizes (such as 15-inch and 16-inch wheels) while complementing light-weight handling.
  • Owners of hatchbacks and compact performance cars (like the Honda Fit, Mini Cooper, and Fiat 500) note that the tire significantly improves daily comfort and reduces cabin noise compared to stiffer factory options.
  • Some drivers utilizing these tires on heavier or higher-horsepower sedans noted that the softer sidewalls can feel slightly less sharp during high-speed maneuvers compared to dedicated track-focused rubber.

Reviews from our readers

Drivers who have these tires on their car, in their own words. We check every review before it goes live.

No reviews from our readers yet

Driving on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701? Tell other drivers how it grips, rides and wears.

Write a review
Overall rating
Rate what you have tried (optional)
Dry grip
Wet grip
Handling
Ride comfort
Quietness
Treadwear
Would you buy them again? (optional)

At least 40 characters.

Leave it empty to post anonymously.

We read every review before it goes live. Your IP address is never shown; a scrambled form of it is kept for up to a year to stop spam.

6 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18

6th of 22
DisciplinePlacementField position
Tested Tread Life (Miles)2nd of 22

Source: Consumer Reports

2019 Auto Bild Summer tire Test · 225/45 R17

14th of 20
Best: Noise · 2nd Weakest: Wet Braking · 19th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking19th of 20
Wet Handling16th of 20
Dry Braking6th of 20
Dry Handling14th of 20
Rolling Resistance7th of 20
Straight Aqua15th of 20
Subj. Comfort17th of 20
Noise2nd of 20
Value17th of 20
Price17th of 20
Wear14th of 20
Total Cost of Ownership14th of 20

Source: Auto Bild

2019 Summer 53 tire Braking Shootout · 225/45 R17

16th of 45
Best: Dry Braking · 8th Weakest: Wet Braking · 21st
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking21st of 45
Dry Braking8th of 45

Source: Auto Bild

2018 Auto Review 225/45 R17 tire Test · 225/45 R17

9th of 11

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Autoreview

2017 Auto Bild Summer tire Test · 225/50 R17

19th of 20
Best: Dry Braking · 5th Weakest: Wet Handling · 19th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking18th of 20
Wet Handling19th of 20
Dry Braking5th of 20
Dry Handling9th of 20
Wear9th of 20

Source: Auto Bild

2017 Auto Bild Summer tire Shootout · 225/50 R17

15th of 43

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Auto Bild

What owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of the scores above.

Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.

Sentiment breakdown
Positive18%
Mixed82%
Top themes
#daily driving suitability#treadwear and lifespan#budget summer performance#comparison to Michelin#steering feel and turn-in#wheel sizing availability

From 22 threads and comments.

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 compared

Compare any two

Other tires to consider

Ranked by our Relative score, weighed against how many reviews and tests stand behind it.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.