Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 10 road tests and 2,189 + 162 owner reviews. How we score
ADVAN Fleva V701 leads, 70–67 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,189 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Tests 70 · 10 tests Owners 62 · 162 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 10 tests | 78 | 97 |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 69 |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.3 = 74
Advan Sport V107: 60% × 97.3 + 40% × 69.2 = 86
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 10 tests | 70 | 83 |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 68 |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 64 = 68
Advan Sport V107: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 68.1 = 77
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 49 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 13 | – |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 49.1 (est.) + 40% × 12.7 = 35
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests | 62 | 43 |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 56 |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.5 + 60% × 61.5 = 62
Advan Sport V107: 40% × 43.2 + 60% × 56 = 51
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests | 75 | 43 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 65 |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 60.1 = 69
Advan Sport V107: 60% × 43.2 + 40% × 65.4 = 52
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 4 tests | 75 | 46 |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 46 |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 59.4 = 69
Advan Sport V107: 60% × 45.8 + 40% × 45.7 = 46
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 72 | 70 |
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests | 71 | 10 |
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 | Yokohama Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 67 |
| Dry | 74 | 86 |
| Wet | 68 | 77 |
| Snow | 35 | – |
| Comfort | 62 | 51 |
| Noise | 69 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 46 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 70 |
| Efficiency | 71 | 10 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ADVAN Fleva V701
Advan Sport V107
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Advan Sport V107 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | 96% #4/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 96% #3/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 87% #21/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | 82% #27/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 96% #6/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 92% #6/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 97% #16/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 66% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 71% #15/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 78% #7/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 71% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 74% #13/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #14/20 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | #20/20 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 57% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 78% #11/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | #18/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
“Online reviews in general are such a crapshoot. So many times you see products with diametrically opposed opinions. It's tough to sift through to figure out what may be true for your own application/situation. I'm sure part of the reason less people buy the Vredestein is brand recognition. Like underscore...I would say I've never heard of them...other than that I have seen their brand as I've been looking for tires to go on my 15" OZ rally wheels. They had a tire in an uncommon 215-50-15. Since you have first hand experience that is positive, that's probably worth more than 99% of online reviews. I'll probably go with Yokohama Advan Fleva v701 in 205-55-15 eventually. I've seen glowing reviews for them and reviews that say they are garbage. I'd like to get Yokohama Advan HF Type-D for their period correctness, and because I just think they look cool ( and isn't that what's most important in a tire? ) ...but they are difficult to get in the States. Well, maybe not difficult, just costly. When I looked on Nengun, it was about $650 for shipping on a set of 4. Most UK & European suppliers I've found won't even ship them to the US. But I'm getting way off topic here.”
Based on 22 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 | B · Yokohama Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 70 | 136 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | 300 A A | 240 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 29 | 29 |
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
Narrow edge: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better efficiency, treadwear and noise. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 if dry and wet matter most to you.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 10 on efficiency.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 46 on treadwear.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 52 on noise.
Yokohama Advan Sport V107 scores 86 vs 74 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Yokohama Advan Sport V107, 77 vs 68 on our wet score.
Yokohama Advan Sport V107, 86 vs 74 on our dry score.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 52 on our noise score.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 62 vs 51 on our comfort score.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 46 on our treadwear score.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 71 vs 10 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
