Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Too close to call: ADVAN Fleva V701 and BluEarth Es ES32 are level at 70.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 59 · 2,186 reviews

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)77–
    Reviews found online6970
  2. 68

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +4
    72
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)70–
    Reviews found online6573
  3. 36

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online14–
  4. 63

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +9
    72
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)62–
    Reviews found online6474
  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)74–
    Reviews found online61–
  6. 69

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)74–
    Reviews found online6165
  7. 71

    Handling

    BluEarth Es ES32 +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online7173
Scores at a glance
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Fleva V701Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 70 70
Dry 74 69
Wet 68 72
Snow 36 –
Comfort 63 72
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 69 65
Handling 71 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ADVAN Fleva V701

BluEarth Es ES32

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.

Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear#Comparison with Michelin

Based on 20 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7064
Rim diameters15″ – 20″13″ – 18″
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG300 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Too close to call: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 and Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is stronger on dry and treadwear. Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is stronger on comfort and wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 68 on wet.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Too close to call

ADVAN Fleva V701

Amazon