Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 97 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE003 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 97 + 2,195 owner reviews. How we score
Adrenalin RE003 leads, 73–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,195 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
Adrenalin RE003 +274Why this score
Source Adrenalin RE003 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 80 68 Adrenalin RE003: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 76
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.5 = 74
No road tests of dry for Adrenalin RE003. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
74
Wet
Adrenalin RE003 +767Why this score
Source Adrenalin RE003 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 76 64 Adrenalin RE003: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 74
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67
No road tests of wet for Adrenalin RE003. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison36Why this score
Source Adrenalin RE003 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online – 12 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52 (est.) + 40% × 12.3 = 36
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
67
Comfort
Adrenalin RE003 +562Why this score
Source Adrenalin RE003 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 67 61 Adrenalin RE003: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.9 = 67
ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Adrenalin RE003. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source Adrenalin RE003 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 75 Reviews found online – 60 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.6 + 40% × 59.7 = 69
-
63
Treadwear
ADVAN Fleva V701 +669Why this score
Source Adrenalin RE003 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 61 59 Adrenalin RE003: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Adrenalin RE003. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
80
Handling (owners)
Adrenalin RE003 +872Why this score
Source Adrenalin RE003 ADVAN Fleva V701 Reviews found online 80 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source Adrenalin RE003 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Adrenalin RE003 | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 70 |
| Dry | 76 | 74 |
| Wet | 74 | 67 |
| Snow | – | 36 |
| Comfort | 67 | 62 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 80 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Adrenalin RE003
70
/ 100
ADVAN Fleva V701
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Adrenalin RE003
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
- Direct and communicative steering feedback
- High value-for-money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance, particularly regarding hydroplaning resistance
- Noticeable road noise, which increases as the tire wears
- Tread life can be disappointing for heavy vehicles or aggressive drivers
Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
- Precise steering response and good road feedback
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
- Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE003
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.
r/Civic_Type_R
·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
r/mr2
·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness
Based on 22 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Adrenalin RE003 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 70 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE003
70
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Adrenalin RE003 — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE003 scores 80 vs 72 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE003 scores 74 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 63 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE003 scores 67 vs 62 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Adrenalin RE003
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Adrenalin RE003 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Which is better in the wet, Adrenalin RE003 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE003, 74 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Adrenalin RE003 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Adrenalin RE003 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE003, 67 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Adrenalin RE003 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology