Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Proxes TR1 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 4 road tests and 900 + 2,189 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 70–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes TR1
Tire AToyo

Proxes TR1

Summer

± 8

Tests 62 · 1 test Owners 66 · 900 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test (comfort (tester's mark))

“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

± 5

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,189 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +14
    74
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests5378
    Reviews found online7067

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 52.9 + 40% × 69.8 = 60

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.3 = 74

  2. 68

    Wet

    Level
    68
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests6670
    Reviews found online7064

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 66.5 + 40% × 69.6 = 68

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 64 = 68

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    35
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 49 (est.)
    Reviews found online–13

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 49.1 (est.) + 40% × 12.7 = 35

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Proxes TR1 +1
    62
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests6862
    Reviews found online6062

    Proxes TR1: 40% × 68.2 + 60% × 59.6 = 63

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.5 + 60% × 61.5 = 62

  5. 68

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests6875
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)60

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 68

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 60.1 = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Proxes TR1. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +7
    69
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 64 (est.)75
    Reviews found online6059

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 62

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 59.4 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TR1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online7272
  8. 71

    Efficiency

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7171
Scores at a glance
Toyo Proxes TR1 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes TR1Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 65 70
Dry 60 74
Wet 68 68
Snow – 35
Comfort 63 62
Noise 68 69
Treadwear 62 69
Handling (owners) 72 72
Efficiency 71 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Proxes TR1

± 5

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryProxes TR1ADVAN Fleva V701ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 87% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 96% #6/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test 98% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 82% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test 87% #21/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 95% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 92% #3/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 99% #4/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 94% #3/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/6 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test #6/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Proxes TR1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and responsive steering feedback
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier-one brands
  • Attractive and aggressive directional tread design

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise and humming sounds at certain speeds
  • Soft sidewalls that can cause a slight squirm or delayed initial steering response
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear axles
All owner themes in the Proxes TR1 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Toyo Proxes TR1

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Toyo Proxes TR1 is mixed, with users frequently noting an attractive price point and smooth, comfortable ride when compared to factory tires or run-flats. However, multiple drivers report shortcomings in wet-weather performance, cold grip, and road noise as mileage increases, while several criticize its soft sidewalls for creating imprecise handling at the limit.

Top themes
#Wet grip performance#Soft sidewall stiffness#Affordable price point#Road noise issues#Ride comfort comparison#Handling at limit#T1R model confusion

Based on 36 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.

fiestastforum.com ·2022-11-30

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”

alltrac.net ·2025-04-09

“Online reviews in general are such a crapshoot. So many times you see products with diametrically opposed opinions. It's tough to sift through to figure out what may be true for your own application/situation. I'm sure part of the reason less people buy the Vredestein is brand recognition. Like underscore...I would say I've never heard of them...other than that I have seen their brand as I've been looking for tires to go on my 15" OZ rally wheels. They had a tire in an uncommon 215-50-15. Since you have first hand experience that is positive, that's probably worth more than 99% of online reviews. I'll probably go with Yokohama Advan Fleva v701 in 205-55-15 eventually. I've seen glowing reviews for them and reviews that say they are garbage. I'd like to get Yokohama Advan HF Type-D for their period correctness, and because I just think they look cool ( and isn't that what's most important in a tire? ) ...but they are difficult to get in the States. Well, maybe not difficult, just costly. When I looked on Nengun, it was about $650 for shipping on a set of 4. Most UK & European suppliers I've found won't even ship them to the US. But I'm getting way off topic here.”

Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes TR1 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6170
Rim diameters14″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common4141

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Proxes TR1

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better dry and treadwear. Where the Toyo Proxes TR1 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 60 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 62 on treadwear.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes TR1
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Proxes TR1 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, Proxes TR1 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes TR1 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Proxes TR1 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Proxes TR1 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 62 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Proxes TR1 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Proxes TR1 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology