tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 vs Kumho Ecowing ES31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 75 + 9,931 owner reviews. How we score

Ecowing ES31 is ahead, 63–55

Check price on Amazon · Ecowing ES31 or Ecopia EP150 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecowing ES31
Tire BKumho

Ecowing ES31

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 9,931 reviews

“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 54

    Dry

    Ecowing ES31 +10
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online4662

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 54

    Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64

    No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 58

    Wet

    Ecowing ES31 +5
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5360

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58

    Ecowing ES31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63

    No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 48

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)–
    Reviews found online33–

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 58.6 (est.) + 40% × 32.9 = 48

    No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    Ecowing ES31 +9
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4761

    Ecopia EP150: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 47 = 54

    Ecowing ES31: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.8 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 60

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online49–

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.3 = 60

    No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP150. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 55

    Treadwear

    Ecowing ES31 +11
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Ecowing ES31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4865

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 55

    Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 50

    Handling (owners)

    Ecowing ES31 +5
    55
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Ecowing ES31
    Reviews found online5055
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Ecopia EP150Kumho Ecowing ES31
Relative Score 55 63
Dry 54 64
Wet 58 63
Snow 48 –
Comfort 54 63
Noise 60 –
Treadwear 55 66
Handling (owners) 50 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecopia EP150

± 8

Ecowing ES31

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEcopia EP150Ecowing ES31ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/16 2014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tyre Test #9/18 2022 ADAC 16" SUV Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecopia EP150

Pros

  • High level of ride comfort and low-speed smoothness
  • Generally durable construction capable of handling potholes
  • Satisfactory dry-road handling for casual, daily driving

Cons

  • Frequently cited as dangerous or unpredictable in wet conditions
  • Noticeable increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Inconsistent tread wear, with some users reporting premature failure
All owner themes in the Ecopia EP150 review

Tire B Ecowing ES31

Pros

  • Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium brand alternatives
  • Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort over bumps and speed humps
  • Improved fuel economy and reduced rolling resistance

Cons

  • Polarizing wet weather performance, with some users reporting frightening losses of traction
  • Soft sidewalls that can feel vague during quick lane changes or lead to vulnerability against curbs and potholes
  • Occasional reports of accelerated or uneven tread wear on outer shoulders
All owner themes in the Ecowing ES31 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Kumho Ecowing ES31

Mixed

The Kumho Ecowing ES31 is generally viewed as an affordable, budget-friendly mid-range summer tire that offers good durability and dry grip, making it popular among commuters and rideshare drivers. However, opinions are mixed regarding its wet weather performance, with some users reporting poor wet grip while others find it acceptable for cautious, everyday driving.

r/carros ·8 upvotes ·2026-03-04

“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”
r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2025-11-05

“The EU label is all over the place. But none have A-A-A as far as I can tell. Did not score good in wet in the test on the site. Wear rate on a Mazda 2 should be decent with almost anything. Why not look at all seasons? Sava All weather and Kumho Solus are closest to the ES31 in price.”
r/CarsAustralia ·2 upvotes ·2026-07-05

“ES31s are fine, they're your usual budget tyre. Certainly not meant for any spirited driving or for sport type cars. I've had them before on the front my my Yaris and they were acceptable, got maybe 40,000km out of them.”
Top themes
#Cost effectiveness and value#Wet weather grip#Treadwear and durability#Budget tier limitations#Urban commuting suitability

Based on 12 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 B · Kumho Ecowing ES31
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2439
Rim diameters13″ – 17″13″ – 18″
UTQG200 B B—
SidewallBlackwall—
Sizes in common1515

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150

Kumho Ecowing ES31

Winner: Kumho Ecowing ES31 — better treadwear, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 66 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 64 vs 54 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 63 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 63 vs 58 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES31
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecopia EP150 or Ecowing ES31?

Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP150 or Ecowing ES31?

Kumho Ecowing ES31, 63 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP150 or Ecowing ES31?

Kumho Ecowing ES31, 64 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP150 or Ecowing ES31?

Kumho Ecowing ES31, 63 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP150 or Ecowing ES31?

Kumho Ecowing ES31, 66 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology