tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 vs Dunlop SP Sport LM705 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 75 + 39 owner reviews. How we score

SP Sport LM705 is ahead, 65–55

Check price on Amazon · SP Sport LM705 or Ecopia EP150 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 54

    Dry

    SP Sport LM705 +13
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4766

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 46.8 = 54

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 58

    Wet

    SP Sport LM705 +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5359

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 58

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 62

    No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 48

    Snow

    SP Sport LM705 +14
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online3457

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 57 (est.) + 40% × 33.8 = 48

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 62

    No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 55

    Comfort

    SP Sport LM705 +15
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4871

    Ecopia EP150: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 47.6 = 55

    SP Sport LM705: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP150 or SP Sport LM705. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 60

    Noise

    SP Sport LM705 +2
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5056

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 60

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP150 or SP Sport LM705. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 55

    Treadwear

    SP Sport LM705 +12
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4768

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 55

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 50

    Handling (owners)

    SP Sport LM705 +16
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150SP Sport LM705
    Reviews found online5066
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Ecopia EP150Dunlop SP Sport LM705
Relative Score 55 65
Dry 54 67
Wet 58 62
Snow 48 62
Comfort 55 70
Noise 60 62
Treadwear 55 67
Handling (owners) 50 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecopia EP150

± 8

SP Sport LM705

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecopia EP150

Pros

  • High level of ride comfort and low-speed smoothness
  • Generally durable construction capable of handling potholes
  • Satisfactory dry-road handling for casual, daily driving

Cons

  • Frequently cited as dangerous or unpredictable in wet conditions
  • Noticeable increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Inconsistent tread wear, with some users reporting premature failure
All owner themes in the Ecopia EP150 review

Tire B SP Sport LM705

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth bump/pothole absorption
  • Very low road noise and quiet highway operation
  • High value for money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Significantly compromised wet grip and poor performance in heavy rain
  • Soft sidewalls lead to mushy steering response and lack of high-speed handling feedback
  • Faster-than-expected wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the SP Sport LM705 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 B · Dunlop SP Sport LM705
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available246
Rim diameters13″ – 17″16″ – 19″
UTQG200 B B—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150

Dunlop SP Sport LM705

Winner: Dunlop SP Sport LM705 — better handling, comfort and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 66 vs 50 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 70 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 62 vs 48 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 67 vs 54 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Dunlop SP Sport LM705
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecopia EP150 or SP Sport LM705?

Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP150 or SP Sport LM705?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 62 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP150 or SP Sport LM705?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 67 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Ecopia EP150 or SP Sport LM705?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 62 vs 48 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Ecopia EP150 or SP Sport LM705?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 62 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP150 or SP Sport LM705?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 70 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP150 or SP Sport LM705?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 67 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology