Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 75 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Ecopia EP150 is ahead, 58–38

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    Ecopia EP150 +20
    37
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Geolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 49 (est.)
    Reviews found online5221

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 57

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 48.7 (est.) + 40% × 20.5 = 37

    No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 61

    Wet

    Ecopia EP150 +29
    32
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Geolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 41 (est.)
    Reviews found online5819

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 61

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 41.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.9 = 32

    No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 49

    Snow

    Ecopia EP150 +1
    48
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Geolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online3533

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 34.9 = 49

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 32.5 = 48

    No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Ecopia EP150 +20
    41
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Geolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online5414

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 61

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 14.1 = 41

    No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP150 or Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    Ecopia EP150 +10
    52
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Geolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5529

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 62

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 29 = 52

    No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP150 or Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    Ecopia EP150 +19
    39
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Geolandar G91A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online5220

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.4 = 58

    Geolandar G91A: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 20.1 = 39

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 55

    Handling (owners)

    Ecopia EP150 +32
    23
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Geolandar G91A
    Reviews found online5523
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Ecopia EP150Yokohama Geolandar G91A
Relative Score 58 38
Dry 57 37
Wet 61 32
Snow 49 48
Comfort 61 41
Noise 62 52
Treadwear 58 39
Handling (owners) 55 23

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecopia EP150

Geolandar G91A

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecopia EP150

Pros

  • High level of ride comfort and low-speed smoothness
  • Generally durable construction capable of handling potholes
  • Satisfactory dry-road handling for casual, daily driving

Cons

  • Frequently cited as dangerous or unpredictable in wet conditions
  • Noticeable increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Inconsistent tread wear, with some users reporting premature failure
All owner themes in the Ecopia EP150 review

Tire B Geolandar G91A

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A
CategorySummerAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available241
Rim diameters13″ – 17″17″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG200 B B280 B A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150

Yokohama Geolandar G91A

Winner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G91A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 scores 55 vs 23 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 scores 61 vs 32 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 scores 57 vs 37 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 scores 61 vs 41 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecopia EP150 or Geolandar G91A?

Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP150 or Geolandar G91A?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150, 61 vs 32 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP150 or Geolandar G91A?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150, 57 vs 37 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Ecopia EP150 or Geolandar G91A?

Neither, by our numbers: 49 vs 48 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Ecopia EP150 or Geolandar G91A?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150, 62 vs 52 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP150 or Geolandar G91A?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150, 61 vs 41 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP150 or Geolandar G91A?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150, 58 vs 39 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology