Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 17 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 vs Bridgestone Potenza RE11 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 17 + 13 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza RE11 leads, 73–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 13 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Potenza RE11 +977Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Potenza RE11 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 69 83 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 68
Potenza RE11: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 82.7 = 77
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
71
Wet
Potenza RE11 +273Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Potenza RE11 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 71 74 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 71
Potenza RE11: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison56Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Potenza RE11 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online – 46 Potenza RE11: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 56
No road tests of snow for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
69
Comfort
Level69Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Potenza RE11 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 69 70 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
Potenza RE11: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP300 or Potenza RE11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison68Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Potenza RE11 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 68 Potenza RE11: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68
No road tests of noise for Potenza RE11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
Ecopia EP300 +366Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Potenza RE11 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 71 66 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.2 = 69
Potenza RE11: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Potenza RE11 +978Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Potenza RE11 Reviews found online 69 78
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | Bridgestone Potenza RE11 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 73 |
| Dry | 68 | 77 |
| Wet | 71 | 73 |
| Snow | – | 56 |
| Comfort | 69 | 69 |
| Noise | – | 68 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ecopia EP300
Potenza RE11
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
Cons
- Wet weather grip can diminish significantly as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can result in a 'floaty' or bouncy driving feel
- Not intended for performance-oriented driving or aggressive cornering
Tire B Potenza RE11
Pros
- Surreal and formidable dry grip
- Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
- Better-than-expected tread life and longevity under spirited driving and track use
Cons
- Can become greasy on a hot track if pushed too hard
- Increases in road noise compared to standard tires
- Stiff sidewalls that contribute to a firmer ride
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | B · Bridgestone Potenza RE11 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 29 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300
Bridgestone Potenza RE11
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Potenza RE11 — better dry and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 if treadwear matters most to you. Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Bridgestone Potenza RE11 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 77 vs 68 on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 78 vs 69 on handling.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 69 vs 66 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP300 or Potenza RE11?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP300 or Potenza RE11?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP300 or Potenza RE11?
Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 77 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP300 or Potenza RE11?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP300 or Potenza RE11?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology