Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 13 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 27 road tests and 13 + 6,632 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 4 S is ahead, 85–73
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 82 · 27 tests Owners 86 · 6,632 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)
“A note about the pilot sport 4 S: in cold weather (below 5 degrees) even if it isn't icy, the tyre compound hardens and has dramatically reduced grip. They are excellent summer tyres though, good in the wet too. These days I run Uniroyal rainsport 5 and they're very good.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
78
Dry
Pilot Sport 4 S +1593Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 Pilot Sport 4 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 94 Reviews found online 83 92 Potenza RE11: 60% × 74.3 (est.) + 40% × 82.8 = 78
Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 94.3 + 40% × 92.1 = 93
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
73
Wet
Pilot Sport 4 S +1588Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 Pilot Sport 4 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 86 Reviews found online 74 91 Potenza RE11: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73
Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 86.4 + 40% × 90.6 = 88
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
55
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 Pilot Sport 4 S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) – Reviews found online 46 – Potenza RE11: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 46.3 = 55
No road tests of snow for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
70
Comfort
Pilot Sport 4 S +979Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 Pilot Sport 4 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 70 84 Potenza RE11: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 70 = 70
Pilot Sport 4 S: 40% × 70.4 + 60% × 84.2 = 79
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Noise
Pilot Sport 4 S +269Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 Pilot Sport 4 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 67 ≈ 67 (est.) Potenza RE11: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 67
Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 69
No road tests of noise for Potenza RE11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 S. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
66
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 4 S +672Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 Pilot Sport 4 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 66 74 Potenza RE11: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66
Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 74 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
78
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport 4 S +1290Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 Pilot Sport 4 S Reviews found online 78 90 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison72Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 Pilot Sport 4 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests – 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE11 | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 85 |
| Dry | 78 | 93 |
| Wet | 73 | 88 |
| Snow | 55 | – |
| Comfort | 70 | 79 |
| Noise | 67 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | 90 |
| Efficiency | – | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza RE11
Pilot Sport 4 S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE11
Pros
- Surreal and formidable dry grip
- Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
- Better-than-expected tread life and longevity under spirited driving and track use
Cons
- Can become greasy on a hot track if pushed too hard
- Increases in road noise compared to standard tires
- Stiff sidewalls that contribute to a firmer ride
Tire B Pilot Sport 4 S
Pros
- Exceptional grip and predictable handling in both dry and wet conditions
- Noticeable reduction in road noise and improved ride comfort compared to competitors and run-flats
- Sharper steering response and improved cornering stability
Cons
- High initial purchase price
- Rapid tread wear reported by some aggressive drivers and track users
- Soft sidewalls can cause a slightly vague or laggy initial response during rapid steering transitions
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Potenza RE11
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S as a benchmark max-performance summer tire, praising its outstanding dry and wet grip, stability, and daily driving refinement. Common criticisms focus on its premium price, rapid tread wear on high-powered heavy vehicles or hot track sessions, and significantly reduced grip in cold weather. Many enthusiasts consider it an ideal street tire, though some note softer sidewalls compared to predecessors or recommend dedicated track tires for hard circuit driving.
“I just went 12k on PSS for mixed use weekend and HDPE. 275/35 19x10 front and 305/30 19x11rear stagger. I replaced the PS4s from stock purchased PP1. I immediately noticed the PSS seemed a little louder and the concrete joints were felt and heard. Now after putting on 285/35 and 325/30 MP4S I'm enjoying a better ride. I have a track event this weekend so I'll get to test the 4S in track duty.”
“I had a similar experience with Discount Tire and brand new Michelin PS4S's. I clipped a large lane marker (not a dot, a turtle) with both driver's side tires and pinch-flatted them both. I had driven them less than 10 miles so Discount Tire replaced them for only $50 without me even asking for a discount. I had purchased them for about $450 each and didn't buy a road hazard warranty, so I was very pleased with Discount Tire.”
“My 2023 20th AE Golf R came with Hankook tires , and I've been very pleased with them. I'm a fairly aggressive driver and frequent the twisty roads in the Santa Monica Mountains. I also have a mildly modded Mk VI Golf R shod with Michelin Pilot Sport 4s tires on factory 18" rims, and the Hankooks seem to perform almost as well in the dry, but outshine the PS4s in the wet. I will most likely need new tires next year, but I am undecided between the Hankooks and the Michelin PS4AS tires . As for Continental tires ... I use Continental tubular tires on my road bicycle, but have experienced many problems, including massive chunking with them on my 1974 BMW 2002Tii and my 1979 Scirocco Gti , so I am not going to use them on my cars again.”
Based on 208 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE11 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 110 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 200 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE11
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza RE11 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 93 vs 78 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 88 vs 73 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 90 vs 78 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 79 vs 70 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE11 or Pilot Sport 4 S?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE11 or Pilot Sport 4 S?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 88 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE11 or Pilot Sport 4 S?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 93 vs 78 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Potenza RE11 or Pilot Sport 4 S?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE11 or Pilot Sport 4 S?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 79 vs 70 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE11 or Pilot Sport 4 S?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 72 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology