tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 vs Dunlop SP Sport LM705 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 17 + 39 owner reviews. How we score

Ecopia EP300 is ahead, 70–65

Check price on Amazon · Ecopia EP300 or SP Sport LM705 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Ecopia EP300 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP300SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7065

    Ecopia EP300: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 69

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Ecopia EP300 +10
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP300SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7259

    Ecopia EP300: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 62

    No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP300SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–56

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 62

    No road tests of snow for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    SP Sport LM705 +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP300SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6771

    Ecopia EP300: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 67 = 68

    SP Sport LM705: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 70.6 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP300SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–56

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.6 = 62

    No road tests of noise for SP Sport LM705. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Ecopia EP300 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP300SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7368

    Ecopia EP300: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Ecopia EP300 +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP300SP Sport LM705
    Reviews found online7166
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Ecopia EP300Dunlop SP Sport LM705
Relative Score 70 65
Dry 69 66
Wet 72 62
Snow – 62
Comfort 68 70
Noise – 62
Treadwear 70 68
Handling (owners) 71 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecopia EP300

± 8

SP Sport LM705

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecopia EP300

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Noticeable improvements in fuel economy

Cons

  • Wet weather grip can diminish significantly as the tire wears
  • Soft sidewalls can result in a 'floaty' or bouncy driving feel
  • Not intended for performance-oriented driving or aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the Ecopia EP300 review

Tire B SP Sport LM705

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth bump/pothole absorption
  • Very low road noise and quiet highway operation
  • High value for money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Significantly compromised wet grip and poor performance in heavy rain
  • Soft sidewalls lead to mushy steering response and lack of high-speed handling feedback
  • Faster-than-expected wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the SP Sport LM705 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 B · Dunlop SP Sport LM705
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available296
Rim diameters15″ – 18″16″ – 19″
UTQG—400 B A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP300

Dunlop SP Sport LM705

Winner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 — better wet and dry. Where the Dunlop SP Sport LM705 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 72 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 69 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP300
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Dunlop SP Sport LM705
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecopia EP300 or SP Sport LM705?

Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP300 or SP Sport LM705?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 72 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP300 or SP Sport LM705?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 69 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP300 or SP Sport LM705?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP300 or SP Sport LM705?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology