Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 17 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 vs Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ecopia EP300 leads, 69–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 30 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Ecopia EP300 +266Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Assurance Triplemax 2 Reviews found online 68 65 -
71
Wet
Ecopia EP300 +368Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Assurance Triplemax 2 Reviews found online 71 67 -
69
Comfort
Ecopia EP300 +465Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Assurance Triplemax 2 Reviews found online 69 62 -
69
Treadwear
Ecopia EP300 +465Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Assurance Triplemax 2 Reviews found online 71 65 -
69
Handling
Ecopia EP300 +663Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Assurance Triplemax 2 Reviews found online 69 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 66 |
| Dry | 68 | 66 |
| Wet | 71 | 68 |
| Comfort | 69 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 65 |
| Handling | 69 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP300
Assurance Triplemax 2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
Cons
- Wet weather grip can diminish significantly as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can result in a 'floaty' or bouncy driving feel
- Not intended for performance-oriented driving or aggressive cornering
Tire B Assurance Triplemax 2
Pros
- Superb dry and wet grip when new
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance and handling during heavy rain
- Good value for money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Becomes significantly noisier as the tread wears down
- Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsh or crashy ride over rough surfaces
- Decline in wet grip and performance as the tire ages or wears past 50%
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | B · Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 29 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 15″ – 17″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2
Winner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 69 vs 63 on handling.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 71 vs 68 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.