Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 17 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 17 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes ST leads, 72–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Proxes ST +472Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 69 75 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 68
Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
71
Wet
Proxes ST +475Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 71 77 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 71
Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison66Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online – 64 Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66
No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
69
Comfort
Proxes ST +372Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 69 74 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP300 or Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
Level69Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 71 72 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.2 = 69
Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Proxes ST +271Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Proxes ST Reviews found online 69 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | Toyo Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 72 |
| Dry | 68 | 72 |
| Wet | 71 | 75 |
| Snow | – | 66 |
| Comfort | 69 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ecopia EP300
Proxes ST
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
Cons
- Wet weather grip can diminish significantly as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can result in a 'floaty' or bouncy driving feel
- Not intended for performance-oriented driving or aggressive cornering
Tire B Proxes ST
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
- Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning
Cons
- Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
- A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
- Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | B · Toyo Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 29 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 19″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300
Toyo Proxes ST
Narrow edge: Toyo Proxes ST — better dry, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 68 on dry.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 75 vs 71 on wet.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 69 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP300 or Proxes ST?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP300 or Proxes ST?
Toyo Proxes ST, 75 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP300 or Proxes ST?
Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP300 or Proxes ST?
Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP300 or Proxes ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology