tirewheelguide

Hankook Optimo H725 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus vs Hankook Optimo H725 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 24 + 36 owner reviews. How we score

Optimo H725 leads, 55–51 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Optimo H725 or Ecopia EP422 Plus on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Optimo H725
Tire BHankook

Optimo H725

All-Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 36 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 47

    Dry

    Optimo H725 +6
    53
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP422 PlusOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online3645

    Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 54.9 (est.) + 40% × 35.8 = 47

    Optimo H725: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53

    No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 53

    Wet

    Optimo H725 +4
    57
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP422 PlusOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online4752

    Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 53

    Optimo H725: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 54

    Snow

    Optimo H725 +1
    55
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP422 PlusOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online4346

    Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 42.6 = 54

    Optimo H725: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55

    No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    Level
    54
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP422 PlusOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online3940

    Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 39.4 = 54

    Optimo H725: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 58

    Noise

    Optimo H725 +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP422 PlusOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4552

    Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 44.6 = 58

    Optimo H725: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H725. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Optimo H725 +2
    56
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP422 PlusOptimo H725
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online4549

    Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 45.3 = 54

    Optimo H725: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H725. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 40

    Handling (owners)

    Optimo H725 +6
    46
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP422 PlusOptimo H725
    Reviews found online4046
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Ecopia EP422 PlusHankook Optimo H725
Relative Score 51 55
Dry 47 53
Wet 53 57
Snow 54 55
Comfort 54 54
Noise 58 61
Treadwear 54 56
Handling (owners) 40 46

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecopia EP422 Plus

Optimo H725

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecopia EP422 Plus

Pros

  • Excellent fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality when new
  • Predictable dry and wet traction for conservative daily commuting

Cons

  • Significantly shorter tread life than advertised or expected
  • Develops loud whining, buzzing, and increased noise as the tread wears down
  • Stiff ride quality or harshness over rough pavement and cracks
All owner themes in the Ecopia EP422 Plus review

Tire B Optimo H725

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus B · Hankook Optimo H725
CategoryAll-SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available15—
Rim diameters15″ – 17″—
Tread depth11/32″9/32″
UTQG640 A A700 A B
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus

Hankook Optimo H725

Narrow edge: Hankook Optimo H725 — better dry, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Optimo H725 scores 53 vs 47 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Optimo H725 scores 46 vs 40 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Optimo H725 scores 57 vs 53 on wet.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Optimo H725 scores 61 vs 58 on noise.

Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Optimo H725
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H725?

Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H725?

Hankook Optimo H725, 57 vs 53 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H725?

Hankook Optimo H725, 53 vs 47 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H725?

Neither, by our numbers: 54 vs 55 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H725?

Hankook Optimo H725, 61 vs 58 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H725?

Neither, by our numbers: 54 vs 54 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H725?

Neither, by our numbers: 54 vs 56 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology