Tests – · none yet Owners 38 · 24 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus vs Yokohama BluEarth S34 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 24 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Ecopia EP422 Plus is ahead, 47–41
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 29 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
43
Dry
Ecopia EP422 Plus +142Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 52 (est.) ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online 30 29 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 52.2 (est.) + 40% × 30.1 = 43
BluEarth S34: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 28.6 = 42
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth S34. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
51
Wet
Ecopia EP422 Plus +1140Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 47 (est.) Reviews found online 44 28 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 43.5 = 51
BluEarth S34: 60% × 47.2 (est.) + 40% × 27.9 = 40
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth S34. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
Ecopia EP422 Plus +647Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 41 31 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 41 = 53
BluEarth S34: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 30.6 = 47
No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for BluEarth S34. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
45
Comfort
Ecopia EP422 Plus +936Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 34 21 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 40% × 61.7 (est.) + 60% × 34.3 = 45
BluEarth S34: 40% × 58.9 (est.) + 60% × 20.5 = 36
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for BluEarth S34. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
56
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 40 – Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 40.3 = 56
No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
50
Treadwear
Ecopia EP422 Plus +446Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus BluEarth S34 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 40 33 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 50
BluEarth S34: 60% × 54.6 (est.) + 40% × 33.3 = 46
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth S34. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
34
Handling (owners)
Ecopia EP422 Plus +1024Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus BluEarth S34 Reviews found online 34 24
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | Yokohama BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 47 | 41 |
| Dry | 43 | 42 |
| Wet | 51 | 40 |
| Snow | 53 | 47 |
| Comfort | 45 | 36 |
| Noise | 56 | – |
| Treadwear | 50 | 46 |
| Handling (owners) | 34 | 24 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ecopia EP422 Plus
BluEarth S34
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP422 Plus
Pros
- Excellent fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality when new
- Predictable dry and wet traction for conservative daily commuting
Cons
- Significantly shorter tread life than advertised or expected
- Develops loud whining, buzzing, and increased noise as the tread wears down
- Stiff ride quality or harshness over rough pavement and cracks
Tire B BluEarth S34
Pros
- Dry grip is described as adequate by most reviewers and as 'phenomenal' by one.
- Low rolling resistance contributes to fuel savings on hybrids.
- One reviewer found handling great and the tire very good value for the price.
Cons
- Wet traction is the most frequent complaint: reports of slipping in the rain, sliding when turning in wet conditions despite traction and stability control, and initial slipperiness on new tires.
- Handling is described as poor or only 'so-so' by several reviewers.
- Noise is prominent, including wind and road noise at speed (one reviewer measured roughly 85 dB at 70 mph).
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | B · Yokohama BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 15 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
Yokohama BluEarth S34
Winner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus — better wet, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama BluEarth S34 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus scores 51 vs 40 on wet.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus scores 34 vs 24 on handling.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus scores 45 vs 36 on comfort.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus scores 53 vs 47 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP422 Plus or BluEarth S34?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP422 Plus or BluEarth S34?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus, 51 vs 40 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP422 Plus or BluEarth S34?
Neither, by our numbers: 43 vs 42 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Ecopia EP422 Plus or BluEarth S34?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus, 53 vs 47 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP422 Plus or BluEarth S34?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus, 45 vs 36 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP422 Plus or BluEarth S34?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus, 50 vs 46 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology