Tests – · none yet Owners 38 · 24 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus vs Nexen N'Fera RU5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 24 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
N'Fera RU5 is ahead, 71–48
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 16 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
43
Dry
N'Fera RU5 +2972Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 52 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 30 75 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 52.3 (est.) + 40% × 30 = 43
N'Fera RU5: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 72
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
51
Wet
N'Fera RU5 +2374Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 44 76 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 55.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 51
N'Fera RU5: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 74
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
N'Fera RU5 +760Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 41 52 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.8 = 53
N'Fera RU5: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 60
No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
45
Comfort
N'Fera RU5 +2974Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 34 76 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 40% × 61.8 (est.) + 60% × 34.4 = 45
N'Fera RU5: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
56
Noise
N'Fera RU5 +1369Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 41 74 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 40.5 = 56
N'Fera RU5: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 69
No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP422 Plus or N'Fera RU5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
50
Treadwear
N'Fera RU5 +2272Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 40 75 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 50
N'Fera RU5: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
34
Handling (owners)
N'Fera RU5 +3973Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus N'Fera RU5 Reviews found online 34 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | Nexen N'Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 48 | 71 |
| Dry | 43 | 72 |
| Wet | 51 | 74 |
| Snow | 53 | 60 |
| Comfort | 45 | 74 |
| Noise | 56 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 34 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP422 Plus
N'Fera RU5
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP422 Plus
Pros
- Excellent fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality when new
- Predictable dry and wet traction for conservative daily commuting
Cons
- Significantly shorter tread life than advertised or expected
- Develops loud whining, buzzing, and increased noise as the tread wears down
- Stiff ride quality or harshness over rough pavement and cracks
Tire B N'Fera RU5
Pros
- Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to major competitor brands
- Impressive tread life and durability, with some users reporting high mileage and slow wear rates
- Strong grip and confident handling on both dry and wet roads
Cons
- Subpar traction and performance in snow and winter conditions, with specific complaints regarding ice and snow handling
- Noise levels are average, with some users noting they are not exceptionally quiet
- Mixed reviews on specialized winter-weather safety outside of mild rainy climates
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | B · Nexen N'Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | All-Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 15 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
Nexen N'Fera RU5
Winner: Nexen N'Fera RU5 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N'Fera RU5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 73 vs 34 on handling.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 72 vs 43 on dry.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 74 vs 45 on comfort.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 74 vs 51 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP422 Plus or N'Fera RU5?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP422 Plus or N'Fera RU5?
Nexen N'Fera RU5, 74 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP422 Plus or N'Fera RU5?
Nexen N'Fera RU5, 72 vs 43 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Ecopia EP422 Plus or N'Fera RU5?
Nexen N'Fera RU5, 60 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Ecopia EP422 Plus or N'Fera RU5?
Nexen N'Fera RU5, 69 vs 56 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP422 Plus or N'Fera RU5?
Nexen N'Fera RU5, 74 vs 45 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP422 Plus or N'Fera RU5?
Nexen N'Fera RU5, 72 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology